Why pixelate this dudes face but not the other two clearly visible ones?
Because the others are only background and have nothing to do with the subject of this post.
But the person wearing this shirt is in this photo/in this post because he is wearing this shirt. And maybe he does not want to be connected to that forever.
Maybe person with blurred out face is op and they think the shirt is hilarious but don’t want their identity known.
But maybe the other two people will happily tell you who he is if you find and ask them.
So you would have protected that person better by also pixelating the other people.
They maybe don’t even want to be seen on this picture on a public forum too.
Doubt they know eachother. This looks like an outside event style of seating. Probably complete strangers.
Most people don’t care if they appear in the background of others’ pictures.
So like…is there a line? Do I take a number? Hows this work?
Yeah, it really depends on whether he can do it parallel or in series.
We’ll need some sort of middle-out jerking compression.
We do need to calculate in the girth factor, though
I’m truly surprised this connection wasn’t made as soon as “# of guys being jerked off” appeared.
I see two arms, so ¿why not both?
Huh, looks more like a bear to me.
In a row?
In parallel 😈
But… But how?
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
- Arthur C. Clarke
A hundred?
Amateur.
