TLDR: Drug dealers in Catalonia have started to adopt GrapheneOS en masse leading to Catalan police suspecting anyone with a Google Pixel is a drug dealer

  • @M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    513 days ago

    Well I do use a Pixel (for lineage OS) and I do make my living selling drugs… wait wait this is a bad example.

  • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Reminds me of getting a notice in Middle School, decades ago, about how a pager was considered “drug paraphernalia”

    There was also a big Bloomberg-Era push by the NYPD to arrest any woman carrying condoms on her person, on the grounds that a woman carrying a condom must be a sex worker.

    • @icegladiator@lemy.lolOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      313 days ago

      Everything I hear about Bloomberg make me question how he ran as a democrat, and then I remember he fits the democratic party better than anyone else…

      • @Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        313 days ago

        NYC’s greatest act was tricking everyone into thinking it’s a progressive city. I am interested in Mamdani at least.

  • @Part4@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Police are not the brightest in any society.

    So I guess somebody needs to tell them that they need to focus their efforts a little better if their current plan is ‘anyone with a Google Pixel is a drug dealer’.

    Can I suggest they start with the people with drugs, rather than the people with the – not uncommon - google phones in their search for drug dealers?

    • kadu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      313 days ago

      Police are not the brightest in any society.

      It’s a literal job requirement. If you’re smart, you’re not going to blindly follow orders. Police cognitive testing literally discards candidates that perform well in intellectual tasks. This is not a conspiracy or a joke, it’s how police works.

      • /home/pineapplelover
        link
        fedilink
        English
        213 days ago

        I’ve also been using it for like 2 years but I really want the hardware of something like the Fairphone. A fairphone or something similar with Graphene would be amazing

        • HiramFromTheChi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          212 days ago

          You can technically put GrapheneOS on a Fairphone, but it’s not officially supported.

          Long term, the GOS team is looking to branch off from their reliance on Pixels.

        • @Zetta@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          013 days ago

          The Graphene OS people have always been talking about how they eventually intend to develop their own hardware. So, possibly they will make something good eventually.

          • Bilb!
            link
            fedilink
            English
            313 days ago

            Not develop their own hardware, but contract an established manufacturer to do it for them. Which is good, they have no business doing hardware!

            • Mike
              link
              fedilink
              English
              013 days ago

              Strange that google is the only option for the only “secure” operating system.

              The have their reasons: https://grapheneos.org/faq#future-devices

              Hey, do you know what is Ring Level minus One ?

              I know you’re only trolling here and I’m feeding into it, but you nerd sniped me just right to explain why your question is stupid on multiple fronts.

              First of all, “Ring -1” is the hypervisor, at least on virtualization-capable devices (which modern Pixels are), and the hypervisor will be Linux’s KVM in this case, which is open source and compiled by the Graphene team as part of the kernel from source.

              Secondly, Arm (which is the architecture basically all phone chips use, including Pixels) has a slightly different model of security, where apps are Exception Level 0, the OS is EL1, the hypervisor is EL2, and the “secure monitor” (or management firmware) is EL3 (and is probably what you were trying to refer to).

              So yeah, I don’t think you know what “Ring -1” is. At least not enough to warrant a snarky comment.

              • @interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                013 days ago

                “-1” is not just hypervisors, things like Intel Management and AMD Platform Security Processor can peer into system memory. I have no doubt similar system exist on ARM, I suspect the radio transceiver can also read system memory and read secrets out of the security devices.

                I don’t think modern phones are trustable devices. They are opaque blackboxes, pretending to have high security but this security only really protects the spyware operators from being notices.

                I don’t think it’s coincidence that the most “secure” and “private” operating system only operates on a very narrow model selection of phones from just one manufacturer. Probably because they have the best technology to keep the inherent backdoor invisible and implausible. A backdoor to a system nobody trusts wouldn’t be very useful.

                • @Zetta@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  113 days ago

                  The original post is about how it’s so secure the piggies can’t get in. Unless the super secret backdoor is only for the shadow government to disappear dissidents with no trace, thus keeping their super secret backdoor secret.

  • @rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    314 days ago

    Basically, if you don’t have a phone the cops can easily backdoor, you must be a criminal.

    “What do you have to hide?” taken to it’s logical conclusion.

    • @Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -214 days ago

      Basically, if you don’t have a phone the cops can easily backdoor, you must be a criminal.

      … and if it’s an obscenely expensive one.

      Normal people either can’t afford these devices or don’t have time for all the hassle of installing and using a rare operating system on a phone.

      • @rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        Pixels are mid range if you buy a generation back. I have 6a and paid $250 two years ago.

        No one forces you to root your Pixel, you are allowed to use it with stock android.

  • @Flockwit@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    313 days ago

    Reminds me of when the US tried to fight “terror” by kidnapping people and shoving them in Gitmo because they were wearing Casio watches, which is apparently a brand favoured by terrorists.

    • @SonOfAntenora@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 days ago

      There was a guide to craft a timed bomb with the f-91w and other common materials. Uploaded by the terrorists. It worked

  • @nroth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    313 days ago

    Hey, the security is nice, but I really like the detailed control over notifications, GMS prompts, and network access. When I used PixelOS, my phone did things I didn’t want it to, and it was hard or impossible to make it stop. On GrapheneOS, the defaults are a pretty good experience. I even recommend it to non-techies since they can use it with the Google apps and its still a more respectful experience, even if they don’t need or want the level of control that I like.

  • @DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    213 days ago

    “Feds”

    checks Wikipedia page for Spain

    Government: “Unitary parliamentary constitutional monarchy”

    🧐

    (Sorry for nitpicking lol 😅)


    But serious tho:

    I kinda hate these weird associations. Its like arresting people who wear glasses because intellectual rebels wear glasses? (Pol Pot?)

    Like can’t someone just use a phone in peace? Most Pixel users don’t even use Graphene OS.

    Hey you know what, drug dealers drink water. Lets arrest people who drink water!

  • @racemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    212 days ago

    Isn’t it likely the police is kind of right?

    I mean, how many people in that community used grapheneos phones before the drug dealers figured out how good they were for their purposes? So in that community, it’s indeed very likely that a grapheneos user is in a drug gang.

    Does that mean that grapheneos is an issue, or bad? Not at all. But i see a lot of digs at the police here at how dumb they are. But if literally most grapheneos users there are drug dealers, is it dumb? It’s just a plain observation that’s pretty correct.

    And it’s kind of logical that proper open source tools that are not full of spyware are better for also such purposes. Doesn’t make these tools a problem. If a politician would now start a crusade against such operating systems, that i would agree is dumb.

    But i don’t see an issue with police somewhere realizing that drugdealers use a specific tool, and focusing on that. Of course sucks for the couple of regular users there that just do it to have control over their device…

    • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      212 days ago

      That really depends on what they do with that information. If people get arrested for having a pixel, that’s a huge issue. If someone merely gets a closer investigation if they’re suspected of another crime, that’s fine.

      The article is light on details.

    • @icegladiator@lemy.lolOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 days ago

      I think most of the criticism towards police is because they are discriminating based on Google Pixels, which is a completely normal car that you can install GrapheneOS on. It would be like targeting anyone driving a Kia because of the Kia Boys

    • @elucubra@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 days ago

      Pixel has a market share of 1.5%, so they kind of stand out. Also, there is no such thing as “federales” in Spain. Spain is not a federation. If they are talking about National Police or Guardia civil, they go through a pretty hard entrance exam, and then have a minimum of one year instruction. Executive ranks must have a university degree. Generally reasonably competent. Mossos (regional) and local police are another story. They are quite a bit less competent.

  • @BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    212 days ago

    I’ve used Samsungs for years, but they have gotten too expensive for what I need, so I went for a Pixel this time around. I got issues with it, but mostly because I’m so used to the Samsung universe. Still way better than an Apple.

    I guess I’m a Spanish drug dealer now.

  • @besselj@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    114 days ago

    They’re mad they can’t use cellbrite to snoop on properly configured GOS phones and that they actually have to do real police work to catch drug dealers

    • @boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      114 days ago

      Yes. They (cellebrite) don’t mention GrapheneOS support very loudly because it’s poor. They can’t decrypt one that’s BFU (Before First Unlock), not even by brute force if it’s a 6 digit passcode apparently. Don’t know if they can get data from an AFU GOS pixel. A year ago when their internal docs leaked, they also had no support for latest iOS at the time, but had brute force support for older versions as long as phone itself wasn’t too new and had AFU access without brute force for even older versions.

      Moral of the story: if there’s a chance police might take your phone to investigate for a crime you hopefully didn’t even commit, shut down your phone completely - the 5x power button trick on iOS disables biometric unlock, but the device itself stays decrypted and thus more vulnerable. Also keep your OS up to date.

      If you’ve got a phone that’s neither iOS nor GrapheneOS, it’s probably pretty much Swiss cheese anyway. IOS isn’t as good as GrapheneOS either, but it offers some protection against Cellebrite if up to date and BFU. But if they keep your phone for long enough (months, years), they’ll get it unlocked because you can’t install updates that would patch any newly discovered vulnerabilities and one day they’ll find a BFU unlock for it, probably.

        • AmbiguousProps
          link
          fedilink
          English
          114 days ago

          Yep, disabling it entirely allows for charging when the device is off, but otherwise, it is functionally useless and is disabled at the hardware level.

      • @Zetta@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        Graphene OS in particular comes with a default feature enabled called Auto Reboot to protect against this. I think it’s set to 18 hours by default because that’s what mine is, but you can go as low as 4 hours.

        If you have it set to four hours, I’d wager your phone would reset way before the pigs had enough time to try and get their way in.

        • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          112 days ago

          Yeah, I have mine at 4 hours and it’s pretty good. It triggers while I’m at work sometimes, but other than that, it’s mostly just when I sleep.

  • @Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    The police: ‘We’ve encountered a difficulty with our paid spying software. Welp it must be just the criminals.’

    Edit: Missed the R and hit the T on our.

    • @Gonzako@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      113 days ago

      pretty much. The original article says that if they have a pixel they have to ask for a warrant

        • @Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          213 days ago

          Yes. Yes it does.

          Or more accurately, they can’t search your phone without you knowing with GrapheneOS, so they have to get a judge to force you to willing unlock it.

          • /home/pineapplelover
            link
            fedilink
            English
            113 days ago

            So they follow the laws only on GrapheneOS users. Iirc other up to date phones are also hard to crack especially if it’s on first unlock

    • console.log(bathing_in_bismuth)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      113 days ago

      Without? Even with paid spying software is hard, as far as data forensics go. Going with Pegasus and the likes, you never know, just reboot every 2 hours if you don’t mind the hassle.

    • @leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      The right (or far right) will probably win the next Spanish elections, which might rekindle independentist sentiment (both left and right have traditionally fucked with Catalonia, but the right has worse excuses), but personally I think we lost our best opportunity when we didn’t follow up on the 2017 declaration of independence.

      The far righ would straight try to genocide us, so there might be an opportunity there. We need to be uncomfortable enough to get off our fat arses and work for our freedom, like back in the 2010s.