- cross-posted to:
- worldnews@lemmygrad.ml
- cross-posted to:
- worldnews@lemmygrad.ml
You must log in or register to comment.
160 is fast?
Sure is compared to most trains in US.
The US is a poor standard for high speed rail, or even trains in general. A better comparison would be with France, where trains can go up to 320kmph.
Chile is also… Not as flat as France.
Something also built by china might be a good comparison. The new high speed trains in Indonesia (also built by china) regularly go up to 350 kmph.
Building high quality rail networks requires legal framework to facilitate that given that initial costs are staggering. The US framework simply leaves everything to private initiative and given the multitude of local land regulation and lack of laws to support strategic mobilization at this scale, it is guaranteed the USA will never have a country-wide high speed rail network. There are just too many interests to satisfy in a very diverse legal landscape across cities, counties, and states.
Class 6 and above are pretty zippy
and about as common as a bigfoot
Not particularly, but it’s important progress for a country with essentially zero inter-city trains running.
Such a pity too, the shape of the country just really seems to make so much sense for trains - just run a big north-south line and connect basically everything anyone would care about.
Removed by mod
Km/h speeds always sound so impressive until you realise it’s not mph.
Who the fuck uses mph
British Empire master race.
mph means absolutely nothing to people living outside the burger empire, you might as well be saying ferrets per hour
