• Hegar
    link
    fedilink
    14 months ago

    Their obvious incompetence is why putin choose them to lead our country.

    • @phubarr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I’ve been telling people for years, Russia most certainly influenced the outcome of the US elections because they have a huge interest in placing inept, incompetent, easily manipulated fools in power, in their “enemy” countries.

      It wouldn’t surprise me if they had something to do with an actor becoming president of Ukraine. They had plans to take Ukraine, and they didn’t want a real politician in power when they tried it.

      • @Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        14 months ago

        My theory is that Putin blames the US for destroying the Soviet Union. He blames us for forcing the USSR into a cold war it never wanted and he saw first hand how endless anti-communist propaganda turned the whole western world against the USSR… So now he believes he is doing to the US what we did to the USSR, bombarding us with endless disinformation and propaganda to destroy our country from the inside out.

        • @phubarr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          14 months ago

          Well done! That is incredibly interesting insight. It makes total sense, I think you’re completely right. Thank you for sharing your thoughts. I’m going to let that marinate in my brain for a good while.

  • Pennomi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14 months ago

    Wouldn’t work from home allow the government to sell office buildings it doesn’t need, and therefore save money?

    • @BossDj@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      24 months ago

      Yeah but work from home pisses off two major Republican sub-groups. One- being someone’s boss gives them a woody. A chance to feel like they’re towering over someone else gives them meaning to their life. Two- republicans hate when people have it better than them, thus born the stereotype of it being truly American to work harder for less money. Get those lazy asses back to hard murican labor, and no free healthcare.

      • Prehensile_cloaca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 months ago

        Three - they’re heavily invested in commercial real estate and need bodies in suites to throw more gold on their hoard

    • @JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Not likely, and there’s a…well, not really good…maybe understandable, or relatable… reason for it.

      It has to do with the cost of commercial real estate, and the government being a barometer for private sector.

      If the government says “everyone RTO”, companies be like “cmon that means us too”. Especially so for government contractors.

      But if people stay remote…then there’s no need for these big buildings in cities. So they sit vacant or underutilized. And then there’s a surplus of commercial real estate, and the commercial real estate sector falls in on itself, and a bunch of other bad things happen.

      But wait, there’s more.

      Why live in expensive, densely packed, overpriced cities, if not for being in close proximity to high paying jobs? Likely what would follow is urban residential and MDU/MFU values tanking as there’s an exodus from cities and nearby towns. And while that might be good for people who don’t own property, a lot of people, especially middle-class people in commuter-ville, will probably be losing their nest-egg. More than likely to be picked up cheap by somebody to build a warehouse or a datacenter or luxury condos or something. Something that takes up a lot of space but doesn’t need a lot of staff.

    • @phubarr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      14 months ago

      They just CAN’T let us have something. They don’t even have a good reason to take it from us, they just don’t want us to have it.

  • Avid Amoeba
    link
    fedilink
    0
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Are federal workers unionized in the US? I see the article says some are.

    • @redhorsejacket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -14 months ago

      Yes. However, federal trade unions are muzzled in the sense that it is against the law for a federal employee to engage in a strike. It’s been on the books since the 50s, but the balance of power really shifted when Reagan enforced it against 10,000 striking air traffic controllers. Some were incarcerated, and nearly all were blackballed from ever working a government job ever again (though that was eventually rescinded in the 90s). There’s no doubt now that even a “liberal” president would follow suit in the event another illegal strike occurred.

  • @FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -14 months ago

    Can’t wait until they fire the employees i need to review my environmental permit submittals and then can never get another project started legally ever again without risking insane amounts of fines four years later when the next administration comes in and hires new people.

    • @Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      04 months ago

      They’ll just completely gut the environmental regulations and eliminate all fines.

      If we want to see what the future will be like for the US, than look no further than Putin’s oligarchy.

      • @FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        -14 months ago

        Yeah, I am a little concerned about that too, but I can tell you that it is going to take YEARS of work to gut legislation like that. I am hoping that even with a Republican trifecta, they still won’t be able to agree on and accomplish anything because they all hate eachother.