Summary

House Democrats, led by Rep. Pramila Jayapal, introduced the We the People Amendment to overturn Citizens United, aiming to curb corporate influence in elections.

The constitutional amendment asserts that constitutional rights apply only to individuals, not corporations, and mandates full disclosure of political contributions.

Jayapal cited Elon Musk’s massive campaign spending and subsequent financial gains as proof of the ruling’s harm.

Advocacy groups praised the move, calling it necessary to combat corporate power and dark money in politics, but Republicans have not backed the proposal.

  • @RufusFirefly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    2029 days ago

    Instead of throwing shit at the wall and seeing what sticks, immediately get rid of the gerontocracy (Schumer, Pelosi), regroup, find a leader with some balls and declare open warfare on Republicans. It’s not like there isn’t any ammunition.

    • Exactly, the conservatives have spent the last 40 years gradually doing exactly this and the Democrats have spent the last 40 years denying that reality and laughing off the right wing, talk show type populists while they slowly took control of the GOP and the court system.

  • Phoenixz
    link
    fedilink
    1029 days ago

    That would have been useful and a great idea over a decade ago.

    Now it’s just “let’s do this” and nothing will happen. Its too late.

    • Random Dent
      link
      fedilink
      English
      329 days ago

      Yeah even if they did actually repeal it, which they won’t, it’s really closing the stable door after the horse has bolted at this point IMO.

      Because with the current administration, you can say it’s illegal to accept money from so-and-so, and they’ll just go “fuck you” and do it anyway and nobody will will stop them or bring consequences, so … yeah. This is kind of doing time, not talking time.

    • @Azal@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      -129 days ago

      I mean… that was literally one of the things that Hillary ran on. So… your timeline checks out.

      • @GroundedGator@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        328 days ago

        Only at the end to try and court Bernie supporters. Before that she was mostly silent and won the primary with corporate money.

        • @Azal@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          128 days ago

          Y’know what, I’ll bite. It’s been long enough I can’t definitively say whether it came up before or not.

          But that’s a point though, she did move her policy to that of the ones that the Bernie supporters and they still snubbed her and we got Trump.

          So in that we made sure the Left didn’t have a seat at the table because they didn’t bother to show up right after showing they had the numbers and ability to do so, and we got a billionaire man-baby who sucks up to other billionaires and fascist regimes. Good trade.

          I say this as a Bernie voter, but my national vote was still for Hillary. Citizens United and the Supreme Court were on the line, I told other leftists it was on the line, I was told I was overreacting… so call me fucking Cassandra.

          • @GroundedGator@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            328 days ago

            I was a Bernie and Hillary voter as well. I also failed to convince a number of other Bernie voters that they had to support Hillary.

            She held too far center for too long and a lot of Bernie voters didn’t trust her or the party. Hell, even when she announced a push for an amendment in her first 30 days I didn’t buy it would happen but I also knew we needed to keep Trump out.

            Really I still didn’t trust the party. I still don’t think we have enough progressives and will still do what we need to keep corporate donors happy above the voting public.

            Money is speech and it has the loudest platform.

      • @glitchdx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        229 days ago

        As we’ve seen though, a woman cannot win against a racist sexist nazi shitbag in the united states.

        Don’t at me (as the young people say), I voted for the woman.

        • @Azal@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          028 days ago

          Pretty much. I just always like to point these things out as there’s a nice bit of revisionism amongst the left on “We want this, why didn’t the dems give it to us” while people don’t show up and vote for them, then cry they didn’t show up because “Dems are as bad as republicans.” Which frankly is as bad as the right on their revisionism.

          The 16 election was an attempt to take down Citizens United as well as bring up the Trans Pacific Partnership. The TPP was specifically trying to get the other Asian countries to lock out China in trade to reduce its power. But the right wingers thought “No we want to be hard on China” pulled out of it, and basically left China to look at all the other Asian countries who didn’t have a partnership with the US and bring them to heel.

          Citizens United came about in 2010, during the Obama administration, and specifically that same year Republicans had gained majority in the House, creating a divided congress that meant no laws could get through, especially an anti-Citizens United bill. An executive order isn’t going to fix this one.

          The Left falls into the same fallacy as the Right, they want a strong leader who can “solve all the problems.” Problem is the Right is really good at it because it’s really their authoritarian style. The part that pisses me off is the Right is also really good at showing up at the polls when they matter even if they hate the candidate, as long as it moves the needle one step over to their side while the Left keeps having a lot of voters be all or nothing.

  • @Gointhefridge@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    430 days ago

    This is one of the single biggest changes we can make to our current electoral system.

    Should’ve done this in 2021. This could’ve changed the 2024 election entirely.

    • sp3ctr4l
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      It should have been done immediately, when the ruling came down in 2010, when the Democrats had a majority in the House and Senate, and Obama was the President.

      I was one year away from graduating college at the time, getting simultaneous bachelor’s degrees in Econ and Poli Sci, trying to explain to people how bad the situation was, and how this may be our only shot at fixing it.

      But uh, nope, Obama had already won, the Dems had already swept the House and Senate to near, but not quite super majorities, and most Dem voters were too busy gloating over these victories and pretending that they meant Republicans would never have power over the Federal government again, and actually? you’re an asshole for implying Obama and the Dems aren’t perfect, in fact you sound racist, get away from me.

      Instead, that was indeed the highwater mark for Dem control in the Federal government (in the last 20 years), and they squandered it, then lost some House and Senate seats, then doomed us all by ratfucking Bernie to run the perfect encapsulation of their sanctimonious and haughty elitism, Hillary, who lost to a rapist, racist, fraudlent fascist.

      cue curb your enthusiasm theme

    • Kate-ay
      link
      fedilink
      030 days ago

      There was less than a 0٪ chance that they could have passed a constitutional ammendment in 2021.

      • Optional
        link
        fedilink
        130 days ago

        Love your downvotes. “Nuh uh!! They just didn’t want to!”

        • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -129 days ago

          They didn’t try. So yes. They didn’t want to.

          When you don’t do something, you don’t wanna do the task. When I delay doing the dishes, I’m not wanting to do them despite how much it’s useful for the home.

          If they didn’t push for this in 2021, they didn’t want it.

      • @technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        -1
        edit-2
        30 days ago

        I guess we’ll never know because they didn’t even try.

        But I’m sure they’ll have a chance now that they’re making a good faith effort! lol.

    • Optional
      link
      fedilink
      -230 days ago

      What did they do in 2021 instead?

      Probably nothing else going on really. They’re just lazy and fat off corporate cash piles, obviously.

      • @Gointhefridge@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        030 days ago

        Nothing. That’s the problem. Democrats are so afraid to play an opposition party cause it will negatively affect party leadership and top donors. They want the status quo and are more than likely benefiting from the Trump regime in many ways.

        Make no bones about it: top Democrats have been complacent with a hostile takeover of the US government because it is benefiting them.

        Progressive Democrats and party newcomers are seeing this reality. They tried to play the game for a bit but got burned like Bernie did. Some democrats are finally growing a backbone to stand up against geriatric party leadership.

        • Optional
          link
          fedilink
          -130 days ago

          Make no bones about it: top Democrats have been complacent with a hostile takeover of the US government because it is benefiting them.

          I mean, I’d make a few bones about it. The best time to be an excellent Progressive party is 50 years ago. The next best time is now, though.

  • @jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    329 days ago

    Do not waste time talking about a non-starter.

    You need 290 votes in the House, you have (at most) 215. You need 75 Republicans to flip.

    If, miracle of miracle, that happens, it goes to the Senate where you need 60 votes to end a filibuster, you have (at best) 47. You need 13 Republicans breaking rank to end cloture + 7 more to pass it.

    Then it goes to the states for ratification, you need 38. In 2024 19 states went to Harris which means you need all of them +19 Trump states.

    Yeahhh…

    • @Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      129 days ago

      The biggest issue is that Dems get rich from this shit too. Even if they had a massive majority it wouldn’t pass.

    • Anti-Face Weapon
      link
      fedilink
      129 days ago

      The thing is, at the very least this forces the Republicans (and for that matter Democrats) to pick a side on the issue.

      Citizens United is extremely unpopular with the Republican base, as it is with the Democrat base. If a Republican voter sees that their Congress person voted to maintain citizens United, they might be upset.

        • Anti-Face Weapon
          link
          fedilink
          -129 days ago

          Some will. But if 1% of the right see this and either become demotivated or change sides, that is enough to swing entire elections.

    • @pulsewidth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      029 days ago

      Check the comments, 75% of the people here don’t believe the simple fact that the Democrats have not had a supermajority to pass such an amendment since 1979, 30 years before the infamous Citizens United win at the Supreme Court became the current interpretation of law.

      They don’t know that the legislation discussed in this post has been brought to vote multiple times by Democrats over the years under different names, and that this is just the latest instance.

      They just want to complain that Democrats ‘don’t do anything good when they have power, and wont even try when they know they cant win’ - handwaving away reality.

  • JaggedRobotPubes
    link
    fedilink
    English
    229 days ago

    Do this and keep doing it until it works. This isn’t a moonshot. It’s normal, sensible change. Everybody shut your fucking mouths with all this secondary “it isn’t going to work now” bitch energy. Get behind the shit you want, loudly.

  • @Pacattack57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    I hate to say it but proposing a constitutional amendment is just virtue signaling at this point. There isn’t a snowballs chance in hell this passes even with 100% democrat support.

    I appreciate the thought and effort but put forth legislation that actually has a chance at passing.

  • @blindbunny@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    129 days ago

    Would have been a lot cooler if Biden did this as a executive action. But you know spinless Democrats and all that…

  • @Bosht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    129 days ago

    Yeah, the sole reason they’re suggesting it now is because they know it’s too little too late. It will go nowhere and we all know this, them Dems will be like ‘oh but we tried!’ Fucking useless.

  • @Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    030 days ago

    So they throw this impossible task out there, something they can put all their energy and rhetoric into which will ultimately not bear results in my lifetime, and they can say see I was fighting against this tyranny.

    This is such a bald-face transparent PR move I hope everyone sees it for what it is.

      • Boomer Humor Doomergod
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        030 days ago

        “But they didn’t have a 90 seat advantage in the Senate and 400 house seats and the presidency!!! How do you expect them to get anything done without that?!?” - centrists

        • @Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -129 days ago

          Well, yes. This. Just reduce the numbers appropriately so it’s not a strawman.

          The American people have voted against democracy. If they don’t have a solid majority of the vote, they can’t do much.

  • @inbeesee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    0
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    Seems like they realize repubs are winning the ‘get rich taking bribes’ game so hard it’s erasing America. Seems like it’s bad enough to alienate donors? Edit: a word

  • @Tronn4@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    029 days ago

    Now they ask for this? After having zero majority in either house? Acter letting a nazi waltz into the white house?

    • Sippy Cup
      link
      fedilink
      129 days ago

      The Democrats have a long history of waiting until Republicans hold a majority in both houses to propose milquetoast change.

      Keeps their name in the papers without actually having to do anything.

      • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost
        link
        fedilink
        English
        228 days ago

        The Democrats have a long history of waiting until Republicans hold a majority in both houses to propose milquetoast change.

        Every time. Legalizing weed? Only when Republicans control. Making abortion federally protected? Only Republican control. Raising the minimum wage? Only when Republicans control.

        When they are in office? Never one of those, but pushing for bills that get everyone in congress paid more by their handlers called lobbyists.

  • @return2ozma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    029 days ago

    Oh NOW Dems want to overturn Citizens United… When they have no more power! 💀🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Fucking useless.

    • To be honest, the Dems have been trying to overturn Citizens United since it was decided. It’s just too difficult to amend the Constitution. And only an amendment can overturn CU.

    • @pulsewidth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      029 days ago

      The last time they could have made a constitutional amendment was when they had a supermajority in 1979. Two decades before Citizens United existed - but, go off.

      • @evilcultist@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        129 days ago

        How many times did republicans try to impeach Biden? How many times does SOPA come back? Or attempts to remove E2EE? They should keep trying on important issues like citizens united.

        • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost
          link
          fedilink
          English
          128 days ago

          They will doge this question because they feel the need to simp for a party who would gladly put them into Gitmo if it meant 0.1% gains in polls.