- cross-posted to:
- politics@lemmy.world
- news@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- politics@lemmy.world
- news@lemmy.world
spoiler
California Governor Gavin Newsom said he has directed his administration to “look at new opportunities to expand trade” as he tries to steer his state around President Donald Trump’s sprawling import tariffs. What To Know
In a post on X, Newsom addressed the U.S.'s global trading partners, writing “California is here and ready to talk.”
It comes after a Fox News report revealed that Newsom is directing his state to pursue “strategic” relationships with countries announcing retaliatory tariffs against the U.S., urging them to exclude California-made products from those taxes.
In response, White House spokesperson Kush Desai told Fox News: “Gavin Newsom should focus on out-of-control homelessness, crime, regulations, and unaffordability in California instead of trying his hand at international dealmaking.”
On Wednesday, the White House imposed a 10 percent baseline tariff on all imports, including those from U.S. allies and non-economically active regions, along with higher rates for countries with large trade surpluses against the U.S. on Wednesday.
The tariffs include a 34 percent tax on imports from China, a 20 percent tax on imports from the European Union, 25 percent on South Korea, 24 percent on Japan and 32 percent on Taiwan. Mexico and Canada, from which most U.S. produce imports come, are exempt from Trump’s latest tariffs, but the 25 percent tariffs that Trump levied on both countries last month will remain intact.
Trump’s announcement sent the markets into turmoil on Thursday, with Wall Street recording its worst day since 2020, when Covid-19 was in full swing. Meanwhile, China hit back with a 34 percent retaliatory tariff on Friday, in the first signs of an all-out trade war that could cripple imports and exports. Other nations are now also mulling over retaliatory tariffs.
Amid the turmoil, the Newsom administration is concerned that California’s almond industry, a key agricultural exporter, could lose billions of dollars, as countries like China, India, and the European Union impose retaliatory tariffs, Fox News reported.
A Newsom official also told Fox News that the new Trump tariffs will hinder access to essential supplies, like construction materials, needed to rebuild after the Los Angeles wildfires. The U.S. currently imposes a 14 percent duty on Canadian lumber, with the rate possibly rising to nearly 27 percent this year.
State officials also expressed concern that retaliatory tariffs will cause significant disruptions to supply chains between California and Baja, arguing that taxing goods each time they cross the border will raise final product prices, ultimately impacting Californians.
Why It Matters
California, the world’s fifth-largest economy, plays a crucial role in driving U.S. economic growth. As the largest importer and second-largest exporter among U.S. states, with over $675 billion in two-way trade, it holds significant economic influence. Therefore, Trump’s tariffs could have a major impact, potentially increasing costs for California businesses, disrupting global supply chains, and putting pressure on vital industries within the state.
What Happens Next
Trump’s tariffs are set to go into effect between April 5 and April 9.
deleted by creator
Cool and all, but uhhh……I better see California fucking apologize for all the shit the Silicon Valley did to the whole country.
As if one Wall Street was bad enough.
Generalissimo Newsom, my aliexpress orders yearn for freedom
See, this is the smart way to take performative action. Just go on TV and lie! Nobody will call you on it! You don’t need to talk for 24 hours, or shit in a bucket, or anything!
the shocking part is that the dems weren’t even willing to do that
California preparing for secession.
Gavin has no juice, he just wants to ride the line of “performatively defying Trump” and “pandering to transphobes” in the run up to 2028.
If a Republican governor was saying this about a Democrat president, I’d believe it. They will flagrantly break the law if they can get away with it. There’s nothing Newsom can legally do to get around tariffs, he just wants a headline. And Democrats will always follow procedures if it means that the poor will get hurt.
newsom is surely lying but it’ll be super funny when trump retaliates by selling california to china so that he can tariff california
Please. Comrade Trump, make it so.
legally
liberals without power and liberals making excuses for not upholding principles don’t break laws. liberals pursuing their interests will, they do not have a fundamentally different ideology from republicans. there are powerful capital interests in california that would love to be immune from the tarriff regime. let the grusome gentleman cook
Yeah as a California resident that hates Newsom with the burning heat of a thousand suns, I’ll let him have this one cuz it would be funny.
Maybe, but the article title is misleading. He never said he wanted to skirt tariffs, he said he wanted to expand with trading partners. That’s vague liberal speak and that usually means “do nothing.”
it’s euphemistic but whether that’s in service of being empty words, or avoiding the terminology that’d make it unconstitutional is unclear. he’s a real ghoul’s ghoul there’s a chance he could’ve gotten calls on his CEO phones and is trying to deal on their behalf
idk about the headlines, but the article sounds more like he’s trying to get California excluded from retaliatory tariffs.
Trump is gonna haul him to prison, and he’ll shit his pants and cry.
The biggest treatler state to avoid treatler tax
BALKANIZE LETS GOOOOO
It’s hilarious that he thinks any foreigner loves California enough to exclude them from retaliatory tariffs
I mean it’s standard tactics to hit the base of the tariff doing party so most likely yes this may work in getting foreign governments who do TARGETED tariffs (given the ones they’re subject to are across the board they may respond in the same way). In terms of applying pressure it is indeed pointless to hit California which didn’t vote for Trump or this policy per se, it makes much more sense to apply pain to red states and red voters and red state companies and industries to make them squeal and their quality of life lower and their plants lay people off so they no longer think they’re winning and begin to question this whole thing and to split the ranks of the group who’s pushing through these things.
So yes this is both posturing to present himself as a "strong leader"™ who stood up to Trump when he runs in 2028 as well as to attempt to mitigate retaliation and direct it where possible elsewhere as well as of course just seeking trade deals and investment under the banner of trying to subvert tariffs.
I could see the EU libs trying to do some nitpicking in their tarrifs, exempting NY/CA. Nobody else on Earth sees enough of a distinction between the two parties to care
I think any foreign government would be ecstatic to undermine the current regime’s dwindling legitimacy.
That would be really funny but I don’t think China likes to meddle in other countries’ internal affairs that way, and I don’t think European countries have the balls to do that sort of thing (although I guess I could be wrong about that)
I don’t think China likes to meddle in other countries’ internal affairs that way
California? You mean the progressive, melting pot bastion with the world’s 4th largest economy?
thinking the word progressive means anything, in the year of our LORD 2025. lol. lmao, even
Remind me again which state just voted to continue legalized slavery through the prison system?
Yes, but the grunts guarding the slaves will be allowed to have a float on the pride parade
Don’t remind me :(
I liked it when the progressive state legislature didn’t even bring a progressive single payer healthcare bill to a vote because they knew they would all have to publicly vote against it, progressively. That was very progressive.
Progressive state that made it legal to kill the homeless. So progressive!
“progressive” state which elected Arnold Schwarzenegger, the same “progressive” state which hates the homeless and has unaffordable housing, the “progressive” state with a Governor who invites right-wingers on his podcast like Bannon and Kirk.
“4th largest economy” is also a stretch since most of it is in difficult to measure services sector.
would love to see how much of California’s “economy” is straight landlordism, VC bullshit/silicon valley scam banking, crypto, rent-seeking intellectual property licensing, and Hollywood accounting hoovering up tax breaks and public art supports from far flung geographies for filming on location for a week somewhere.
they throw their weight around a lot as being some kind of engine of economic activity (or cradle of innovation LMAO), but I think if you pull back the curtain, it’s like 10 guys standing in a circle reaching into each other’s pockets, double counting every “trade” while looting every public dollar and stomping the guts out of the broke motherfuckers trapped in the vortex.
You missed the exploiting farm slaves. CA has a huge agriculture industry that uses both migrant and prison labor, with all the assorted agro-chem and water baronism.
would love to see how much of California’s “economy” is straight landlordism, VC bullshit/silicon valley scam banking, crypto, rent-seeking intellectual property licensing, and Hollywood accounting hoovering up tax breaks and public art supports from far flung geographies for filming on location for a week somewhere.
the remaining 20% is oil
To be fair libs outside america see it as their mecca, while others see it as a the place america exports “woke DEI lgtbq+ culture” from
Everybody who does this self-aggrandisement with the word ‘progressive’ is deeply unserious.
sure i do mean that
wtf i love states’ rights now
c’mon balkanize
I think we could have a legit secession movement in California if there were an organized group that could become the government. Newscum ain’t it
Unfortunately, while California does have one of the strongest economies in the world, there is something that global trade can’t address: Water.
Most of California’s water comes from rivers that flow from out of state. It would be really easy to destroy a hypothetical independent California by disrupting water flow from the east.
simply conquer or pacify those watersheds
Yeah an independent California wouldn’t allow this weakness to exist they would take it or lose independence trying. It’s existential.
My point is that California could not just secede, it would result in a massive civil war as almost 2/3 of US domestic food production comes from California, the corn belt is all just that, livestock feed and ethanol tax subsidies.
I mean, it could. It would just need an army to do so and the belief that they could reasonably fight for and secure this water weakness. Civil war though, yes.
The NCR would expand out to the Hoover Dam, of course.
states rights come and take them
My wish junk gonna be hitting clean
Critical support to Gruesome Newscum’s balkanization efforts.