@Fiat126@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • 3 months agomy gleeby deeby asslemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up1495arrow-down16
arrow-up1489arrow-down1imagemy gleeby deeby asslemmy.blahaj.zone@Fiat126@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • 3 months agomessage-square19fedilink
minus-square@smitten@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglish9•3 months agoI’m not actually, just that a binary integer that overflows at 60 couldn’t exist, hence the 5.907 whatever bit length
minus-squarejackeryjoolinkfedilinkEnglish5•3 months agooh, that’s actually clever. And I’m saying that as a software engineer. I missed that possibility :)
minus-square@smitten@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglish4•3 months agoI should have phrased it differently, like “Ah yes, the well known 5.9068905956 bit integer.” But thanks
I’m not actually, just that a binary integer that overflows at 60 couldn’t exist, hence the 5.907 whatever bit length
oh, that’s actually clever. And I’m saying that as a software engineer. I missed that possibility :)
I should have phrased it differently, like “Ah yes, the well known 5.9068905956 bit integer.” But thanks