• @nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    sometimes you bring on a ceo just to get some controversial thing done. they can eat the blame and then leave

      • @LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34 months ago

        So replacing a woman with a woman, and then bringing back the original woman is what made you think the fall person had to be a woman? Reddit may have done so… but I find it hard to believe this was sex/gender related. Otherwise it would have made more sense to replace the woman with a man, have him take the fall and go back to Whitney so it made her / the company look better long term.

    • @friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I’m embarrassed it took me so long to realize this. Somebody explained that to me recently, within the context of a conversation about layoffs. That CEO had no prior CEO experience, was only there for less than a year, and was part of the board of directors. In hindsight it seems so obvious.

    • @corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      They called it an Axe Man, in my time. I’ve been at two companies hit with them, and I follow them AND the CEO who stepped down (once a reverted permanent one and the other a long-term leave) to see which companies are fucked next.