It’s not just lemmy that’s benefiting from Elon Musk.

  • @wahming
    link
    English
    218 months ago

    hundreds of millions lost a trusted, dependable direct link to governments, public figures, and other notable people.

    It should not have been trusted and pervasive to such an extent. If anything, better to cut the dependency now than later.

    • @pup_atlas@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      48 months ago

      That’s a fair argument, and to an extent I agree. That said, I don’t think firebombing something hundreds of millions depend on is not the ideal solution, and it could have been handled differently, like by adding contingencies, for example. Or working in some form of transition period.

      • @wahming
        link
        English
        48 months ago

        In an ideal world, yes. But face it, you, I, and my aunt’s puppy knows that’d never happen. Get every govt agency in the world to cooperate? Yeah right. This might have been one of the best ways we could realistically have ended it.

        • @pup_atlas@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          I disagree. Nationalizing Twitter is definitely idealistic thinking, but adding some small contingencies to the deal definitely is not, and is actually pretty standard in large mergers, to maintain stability.