• @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    02 months ago

    Again, maybe one days you will be on the receiving end of such despicable attacks on private citizens,

    Only if I buy a Tesla.

    Insurance prices will rise across the board

    Nope. This vandalism risk is only related to Tesla.

    also for other brands.

    Why? They are not being vandalised, have no change in risk so have no premium adjustment.

    That is just how insurance works.

    You obviously have no idea how insurance works.

    You can impact new car sales simply by encouraging people to not buy a new Tesla.

    Agreed.

    You don’t need to destroy people’s private property to accomplish that goal.

    Vandalism accomplishes the goal faster and more aggressively

    You are condoning terrorism. Do better.

    I’m condoning nothing. I will even explicitly say Don’t Vandalise Cars. Happy?

    What I am doing is explaining how Musk is affected if people continue to vandalise Teslas.

    • @CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 months ago

      Only if I buy a Tesla.

      First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist.

      Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a trade unionist.

      Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew.

      Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

      Yes, you are the villain here.

        • @CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 months ago

          No. I invoked it to highlight the absurdity of this line of thinking: that it is somehow acceptable to damage the property of a worker who may be completely innocent.

          • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            It’s absurd because there is no slippery slope. People are not going to start torching Ferraris or burn windows 95 CDs.

            It’s offensive because you are using it to defend an actual Nazi.

            Is it somehow acceptable for Elon to damage the lives of millions of worker who may be completely innocent?

            • @CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 month ago

              See you keep saying “defending a Nazi”. I keep saying “you’re torching the personal property of people who are not Elon Musk and who likely innocently bought the vehicle”. If you’re just going to talk right past me and start talking about Musk when I’m talking about individual workers, I don’t see how this is a real conversation at all.

              But just to be clear: torching Teslas that Musk already got paid for does not hurt him.

              • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 month ago

                Just to be clear: torching Teslas that Musk already got paid for does hurt him.

                • Less people are going to buy vehicles that are often vandalised (by torching or other means) and cost more to insure.

                • Demand for Teslas goes down.

                • Less Teslas are sold.

                • Tesla makes less revenue.

                • Less dividends in the future.

                • Lower share prices now.

                • Musk loses money.


                Trying to claim this isn’t true = defending Nazi interests.

                Individual workers should blame Musk. Not protesters.