• GaryPonderosa
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Waterproofing was more difficult with replaceable batteries. It was a feature you paid extra for.

        • @2ZR_FXE@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -11 year ago

          Was it?

          So many years have passed since that phone came out.

          Manufacturers had more than enough time to do something right besides just being water resistant.

    • UltraHamster64
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      But there was phones from 2010s with removable batteries and water protection.

      And sony have some water resistant phones with removable batteries now

      • GaryPonderosa
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        It’s more expensive to waterproof a phone with a removable battery. Yes, there were phones from the 2010s that were waterproof and had removable batteries, but that was a feature you had to pay extra for.

        • @yetAnotherUser@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -11 year ago

          And phones are currently the most expensive they’ve ever been, even adjusted to inflation. Waterproofing with replacable batteries would barely dent the price, especially after a few years.

          • GaryPonderosa
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I highly doubt that they’re the most expensive they’ve ever been. iPhones and flagship phones may well be because the companies that make them know the morons that buy them will pay $1000 for a status symbol, but you can purchase new smartphones for under $200. Considering the original iPhone cost triple that, your claim seems ludicrous.