• @silasmariner@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -115 days ago

      I think landlords make a lot of sense for commercially-zoned property, and for residentially there needs to be some way to live somewhere even if you can’t afford the mortgage deposit. So there’s nuance here that needs addressing IMO.

        • @silasmariner@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          014 days ago

          Do people get to choose where they live in this scenario, or do we just allocate housing based on where’s currently unoccupied?

          • @SabinStargem@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            114 days ago

            I think under a UBI scenario, people should get to pick the city they want to reside in, then get assigned a public housing unit(s) for their immediate family. They can also be provided free public transport, and a basic UBI vehicle with free fuel.

            Ideally, people would have a bedrock of UBI services to rely upon for their wellbeing, and money is turned into something solely used for lifestyle upgrades: Buying a house of the quality, size, and location you want, a fancier non-UBI car, brand-name food or supplies, private school, ect.