• Virkkunen
    link
    fedilink
    93 days ago

    The only birth control that is 100% effective is not having sex.

    • astrsk
      link
      fedilink
      243 days ago

      Abstinence is not birth control.

      That’s like saying the only way to build a house that doesn’t fall down is to not build the house.

      • @CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 days ago

        Abstinence is extremely effective. However, it’s impractical and associated with moralists and the piss-poor “sex education” that Americans get.

        But it is 100% effective.

        And yes, the best way to build a house that will never, ever fall down is to not build one. It is impractical, and beside the point, but it is true!

        • mosiacmango
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          The abject lack of sex isn’t a way to make sex safer. It’s dodging the danger of sex, not addressing it. Abstinence has 0% effectiveness as safe sex, as the lack of sex is not at all related to safe sex.

          Playing linguistics games is exactly how abstinence gets pushed in the first place. Agreeing that these games are accurate, when they are wholley not, just reinforces those regressive polices.

      • @hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        43 days ago

        It really is, avoiding risk vs mitigating risk. Birth control is summarized as avoiding unwanted pregnancies, not about baby safe sex.

        And I’m not saying “don’t have sex if you don’t want babies” because that’s stupid ass argument considering we have so many other options for birth control for you to choose from

        • astrsk
          link
          fedilink
          73 days ago

          The only safe way to fly is to not fly.

          It’s not birth control.

        • @vfsh@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          123 days ago

          Even after tubal litigation it’s possible to still get pregnant if the fallopian tubes grow back together or if another tube/path forms. It’s somewhat rare (0.5% of women who have had the procedure could get pregnant again)

            • @cynar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              72 days ago

              Vasectomies are a lot easier to double check. A woman released 1 egg a month. A man released a LOT of swimmers every shot. Go in a cup and check for swimmers.

          • @Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 days ago

            Yeah sure but that’s not what sterilisation means. To be sterile means you’re not making any gametes whatsoever, which typically means a complete removal of the gonads (ie an oophrectomy or orchidectomy). Otherwise you’re not sterile, you’re just infertile.

        • str82L
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 days ago

          Guessing it’s more female “sterilization”

      • @SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 days ago

        OK that’s great and everything and hurrah for the snipped, V for Victory yadda yadda…

        But really, a chart on contraception made by Dr. Dick Beatty?!

        I’m crying over here

      • @LemmeLurk@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 days ago

        I don’t get it. Does that mean on average a couple using condoms for 10 years will be pregnant 1.5 times?

    • @DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 days ago

      The only birth control that is 100% effective is having HOT GAY SEX™

      Alternatively become a Buddhist monk and hit yourself in the balls until you’re infertile, I guess