• @disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    0
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Way to project. Find me articles on Buddhists harming people because they think they can fly. While I’m waiting, would you like me to provide scientific research that resulted in harm?

    You can’t have it both ways. If you want boundaries that protect you from the religious, then you yourself must respect the same boundary.

    • snooggums
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 month ago

      Like every large religion, a significant portion of the followers will ignore any teaching in the right contexts. Christians are about turning the other cheek and loving thy neighbor except for the crusades and witch trials, Islam is the religion of peace except for when it isn’t, and Buddhism has its own exceptions.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhism_and_violence

      As found in other religious traditions, Buddhism has an extensive history of violence dating back to its inception.

      These remarks followed the 1973 student-led uprising, as well as the creation of a Thai parliament and the spread of communism in neighboring East Asian countries. The fear of communism shaking the social forms of Thailand felt a very real threat to Kittivuddho, who expressed his nationalist tendencies in his defense of militant actions. He justified his argument by dehumanizing the Communists and leftists that he opposed. In the interview with Caturat he affirmed that this would not be the killing of people, but rather the killing of monsters/devils. He similarly asserted that while killing of people is prohibited and thus de-meritorious in Buddhist teachings, doing so for the “greater good” will garner greater merit than the act of killing will cost.