@Redditsux@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world • 2 months agoYale ‘Fascism Scholar’ Announces On MSNBC He’s Leaving the US for Canada Before Trump Starts ‘Pulling People’s Passports’www.mediaite.comexternal-linkmessage-square162fedilinkarrow-up11.06Karrow-down16
arrow-up11.05Karrow-down1external-linkYale ‘Fascism Scholar’ Announces On MSNBC He’s Leaving the US for Canada Before Trump Starts ‘Pulling People’s Passports’www.mediaite.com@Redditsux@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world • 2 months agomessage-square162fedilink
minus-square@A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink27•2 months agoThat doesn’t mean we want one A strong Parliament/Congress and judicial system is what keeps any executive in check. We’ve just got the worst of both worlds.
minus-square@CherryBullets@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglish0•edit-22 months agoThe role of a monarch in modern countries is to be a ruler in name only, that way there is no place for another wannabe ruler. There can be only 1.
minus-square@A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink5•2 months agoYou make it sound as if that was the point from the jump, rather than them being a vestigial organ you refuse to get rid of.
minus-square@CherryBullets@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglish0•2 months agoIt was historically what they agreed to. That is their purpose in modern times. Not hard to understand.
minus-square@A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•2 months agoThat is the purpose they adopted to continue to live at taxpayer expense. Also not that hard to understand, yall Europeans can be backwards af about this.
minus-square@CherryBullets@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglish0•2 months agoI’m not European. You’ll understand fast enough why many countries do this when the US gets a wannabe king, because the position isn’t taken 😂
minus-square@A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink0•2 months agoLmao okay so you’re implying that any State without a monarch is susceptible to someone claiming a nonexistent crown? Like its some sort of natural law like entropy? No fam we’ll just kill him
minus-square@CherryBullets@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglish1•2 months agoYou don’t even have the guts to kill him as he says he’s a king currently… gtfoh. You ain’t as ballsy as the French.
minus-square@A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•2 months agoThat’s fair, but I believe history will end on my side in this.
That doesn’t mean we want one
A strong Parliament/Congress and judicial system is what keeps any executive in check. We’ve just got the worst of both worlds.
The role of a monarch in modern countries is to be a ruler in name only, that way there is no place for another wannabe ruler. There can be only 1.
You make it sound as if that was the point from the jump, rather than them being a vestigial organ you refuse to get rid of.
It was historically what they agreed to. That is their purpose in modern times. Not hard to understand.
That is the purpose they adopted to continue to live at taxpayer expense.
Also not that hard to understand, yall Europeans can be backwards af about this.
I’m not European. You’ll understand fast enough why many countries do this when the US gets a wannabe king, because the position isn’t taken 😂
Lmao okay so you’re implying that any State without a monarch is susceptible to someone claiming a nonexistent crown? Like its some sort of natural law like entropy?
No fam we’ll just kill him
You don’t even have the guts to kill him as he says he’s a king currently… gtfoh. You ain’t as ballsy as the French.
That’s fair, but I believe history will end on my side in this.