Honestly: Being a massive, public spokesperson for electric vehicles that had a huge following with the well-off nerds brought us where we are today with electric cars, I’m still convinced about that. But yeah, that’s about the only thing I can think of.
I don’t care how positive the apparent outcome; I simply cannot agree with giving somebody credit for propaganda. Because essentially, that’s what you’re talking about.
We don’t need confidence men like Musk or Trump. They have nothing but their own interests in mind. So he accidentally had a small positive influence? Big deal. If he hadn’t spoken up, another would’ve taken his place.
He deserves no credit, just as he deserves no sympathy.
That sounds very black and white. With age I’ve come to the conclusion that black and white thinking while very satisfying has never led to anything good in my life. I avoid it where possible. It’s a bit harder and it can bring me into situations where I don’t feel the righteous vigor of being on the correct side, but I find that I’ve ruined more with that vigor than what I’ve fixed taking a detail oriented approach.
I do not see any benefit on looking for the illusory middle ground in this case.
It all comes back to the paradox of intolerance I think. If you fail to see an overwhelming every such as fascism in very strict black and white terms, you are not only putting yourself in harms way, you are actively allowing others to come Uber fire as well.
Yes. I approach the issue of Nazi shit stains like Musk in a very black and white perspective. And you should to. In fact, given the context, I find your response honestly deplorable. Even if we forget about Musk and focus on the propaganda issue, your response opens the door to assisting the spread dangerous misinformation that very realistically can cause actual pain and suffering.
Well, in short, by definition it spreads misinformation. Even if a particular propaganda message is technically truthful, by design the message has been alerted to focus on certain things while obscuring others. In other words, it’s not only inherently subjective, but it’s designed to be misinterpreted as objective.
Finally, I do not support any of the common causes or ideas that propaganda is usually intended to reinforce (e.g. patriotism sounds harmless, even positive, but largely is used to encourage bigotry and xenophobia).
List of positive things that he’s done:
Honestly: Being a massive, public spokesperson for electric vehicles that had a huge following with the well-off nerds brought us where we are today with electric cars, I’m still convinced about that. But yeah, that’s about the only thing I can think of.
I don’t care how positive the apparent outcome; I simply cannot agree with giving somebody credit for propaganda. Because essentially, that’s what you’re talking about.
We don’t need confidence men like Musk or Trump. They have nothing but their own interests in mind. So he accidentally had a small positive influence? Big deal. If he hadn’t spoken up, another would’ve taken his place.
He deserves no credit, just as he deserves no sympathy.
That sounds very black and white. With age I’ve come to the conclusion that black and white thinking while very satisfying has never led to anything good in my life. I avoid it where possible. It’s a bit harder and it can bring me into situations where I don’t feel the righteous vigor of being on the correct side, but I find that I’ve ruined more with that vigor than what I’ve fixed taking a detail oriented approach.
I do not see any benefit on looking for the illusory middle ground in this case.
It all comes back to the paradox of intolerance I think. If you fail to see an overwhelming every such as fascism in very strict black and white terms, you are not only putting yourself in harms way, you are actively allowing others to come Uber fire as well.
Yes. I approach the issue of Nazi shit stains like Musk in a very black and white perspective. And you should to. In fact, given the context, I find your response honestly deplorable. Even if we forget about Musk and focus on the propaganda issue, your response opens the door to assisting the spread dangerous misinformation that very realistically can cause actual pain and suffering.
Shame on you.
What’s wrong with propaganda?
Well, in short, by definition it spreads misinformation. Even if a particular propaganda message is technically truthful, by design the message has been alerted to focus on certain things while obscuring others. In other words, it’s not only inherently subjective, but it’s designed to be misinterpreted as objective.
Finally, I do not support any of the common causes or ideas that propaganda is usually intended to reinforce (e.g. patriotism sounds harmless, even positive, but largely is used to encourage bigotry and xenophobia).
What’s wrong with propaganda? Everything.
I take issue with the presence of that bullet. It implies he has the space to have ever done a positive thing.
Oh, no, you see it’s just a placeholder for when he dies.