Pharmacokinetics to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 2 months agoAt least Quark had some integrity.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square90fedilinkarrow-up1647arrow-down125
arrow-up1622arrow-down1imageAt least Quark had some integrity.lemmy.worldPharmacokinetics to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 2 months agomessage-square90fedilink
minus-square@WoodScientist@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish8•1 month agoThere are obviously still contacts where the distinction is important.
minus-square@lagoon8622@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish5•1 month agoSuch as discussing discrimination, statistics, etc
minus-square@surewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink4•1 month agoMaybe from an equity perspective, but not from a lawyer perspective. So you’d probably say “we need more women in law”. Because the topic is women. If the topic was lawyering, then sex won’t come up.
There are obviously still contacts where the distinction is important.
Such as discussing discrimination, statistics, etc
Maybe from an equity perspective, but not from a lawyer perspective. So you’d probably say “we need more women in law”.
Because the topic is women. If the topic was lawyering, then sex won’t come up.