@cm0002@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world • 2 months agoAstronomy Factslemmy.mlimagemessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up156arrow-down11file-textcross-posted to: comics@lemmy.ml
arrow-up155arrow-down1imageAstronomy Factslemmy.ml@cm0002@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world • 2 months agomessage-square10fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: comics@lemmy.ml
minus-squareZloubidalinkfedilink2•2 months agoIt’s all relative in space 😅. But I could reformulate my question: are visible today in our night sky stars that weren’t visible less than 100 years ago?
minus-square@TabbsTheBat@pawb.sociallinkfedilink2•2 months agohttps://www.space.com/astronomers-new-star-nova-explosion-t-coronae-borealis Not exactly the question, but while looking into it I found this :3 a star visible once every 80 years
minus-squareJolteonlinkfedilink1•2 months agoIn order for the stars to actually be less than 100 years old, they would also need to be with a hundred light years of us.
It’s all relative in space 😅. But I could reformulate my question: are visible today in our night sky stars that weren’t visible less than 100 years ago?
https://www.space.com/astronomers-new-star-nova-explosion-t-coronae-borealis
Not exactly the question, but while looking into it I found this :3 a star visible once every 80 years
In order for the stars to actually be less than 100 years old, they would also need to be with a hundred light years of us.