• Xenomorph [comrade/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1073 months ago

    idk what to even say to this, and here I thought the bush jr. years were bad with slapping the “terrorist” label on anything that moves. Please, please, please be careful with whatever you say online anymore because this shit could very easily escalate to black-bagging anyone for saying anything.

    • CeliacMcCarthy [none/use name]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1043 months ago

      and here I thought the bush jr. years were bad with slapping the “terrorist” label on anything that moves

      they were bad, this would not be happening now if not for the war on terror and its liberal complicity

        • CeliacMcCarthy [none/use name]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          853 months ago

          and anyone with a shred of common sense and a concept of morality could tell you that this would be the inevitable result. it was plain as fuckin day and bringing it up just got you called an alarmist and an ideological purity tester

          I hope chuck schumer dies in CECOT

          • FidelChadstro [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            653 months ago

            Thinking back 20 years to all the good liberals who called it when the patriot act was signed into law

            • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              413 months ago

              You really want to feel the paranoia juice? Look up how much of USAPATRIOT was written down and ready to go before 9/11 even happened. I’m not a “9/11 was an inside job” person, for what it’s worth.

              But I am very much a “they were planning this kind of police state bullshit for a long time” guy. Which feels a bit silly having “won” the Cold War a decade before, ending history etc etc. So… what event were they really planning all the crackdown for? (My money’s on the climate)

              • Shaleesh [she/her, comrade/them]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                363 months ago

                I’m not sure about that last part. While it may prove useful in the event of a climate collapse scenario I have doubts as to its purpose being so forward-thinking. The USA is white supremacist, built on slavery, the perpetrator of genocides and born from imperialism. Such a state turning its tools inwards is probably just the natural progression of things.

                • Azarova [they/them]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  103 months ago

                  I think it would be mistake to think that these things weren’t being planned for or that the highest levels of Western governments aren’t climate collapse aware, even if the public-facing rhetoric is all about climate change being a hoax or whatever bullshit is being spun to make sure the average American isn’t (rightfully) extremely alarmed at the situation. The highest echelons of the Western militaries have been planning for climate collapse scenarios for decades. Although it’s definitely correct to say that even without a collapsing biosphere that these tools of imperial control would have eventually turned inward anyway.

                • ElChapoDeChapo [he/him, comrade/them]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  103 months ago

                  Yeah it was probably inevitable but that doesn’t mean there wasn’t a plan

                  The real smoking guns are the convictions for financial crimes including insider trading around 9/11 because how in the hell was there any insider trading if no one knew about it but unfortunately 99% of boomers obsessed with this shit are stuck on “muh steel beans couldn’t be melted by fet jule”

              • @IttihadChe@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                203 months ago

                9/11 doesn’t have to be an inside job. It was an inevitability which they were all aware. The whole “we won” and “end of history” narrative was obviously not true and just meant to attempt to pacify people, they knew they were still conducting global imperialism and that eventually some group(s) would try and strike back

              • Hohsia [any]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                103 months ago

                All roads lead to imperialism/further extraction of the natural world

              • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                8
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                The American Civil Liberties Union alleges that extraordinary rendition was developed during the Clinton administration. CIA officials in the mid-1990s were trying to track down and dismantle militant Islamic organizations in the Middle East, particularly Al Qaeda.[15]

                According to Clinton administration official Richard Clarke:

                ‘extraordinary renditions’, were operations to apprehend terrorists abroad, usually without the knowledge of and almost always without public acknowledgment of the host government … The first time I proposed a snatch, in 1993, the White House Counsel, Lloyd Cutler, demanded a meeting with the President to explain how it violated international law. Clinton had seemed to be siding with Cutler until Al Gore belatedly joined the meeting, having just flown overnight from South Africa. Clinton recapped the arguments on both sides for Gore: ‘Lloyd says this. Dick says that.’ Gore laughed and said, ‘That’s a no-brainer. Of course it’s a violation of international law, that’s why it’s a covert action. The guy is a terrorist. Go grab his ass.’

                Both the Bush and Clinton cases involved apprehending known terrorists abroad, by covert means if necessary. The Bush administration expanded the policy after the 9/11 attacks.

    • @jaxxed@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33 months ago

      Self-Limiting sounds like a dangeros idea. Paraphrasing Tum Snyder: don’t concede early

      • Z_Poster365 [none/use name]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 months ago

        just be careful is all i would advise. don’t make careless death threats, don’t openly discuss blatantly illegal plans, use a VPN, use encrypted messaging (not signal) if you are involved in something slightly more serious and probably don’t put anything in digital writing if you’re actually hardcore (but these people hopefully already know that)