DISCLAIMER: this is not my content that was removed, I just came across it in the modlog and found it to be absurd. If it’s not allowed, I totally understand.

Reason removed was because it’s unrelated.

Unrelated……

The guy was illegally deported without due process. And yet for some reason, suggesting so is somehow “unrelated” to a meme that is trying to say that because he is affiliated (no charges were ever filed against him for gang-related activity) with a gang, he is by default, guilty.

What’s ironic, is that the entire point of the meme is that the bullshit about him being in MS-13 is unrelated to the fact that people want accountability for this administration illegally deporting a man without due process.

This mod has definitely chosen the correct name.

And even taken into consideration that the instance is essentially a troll haven for wayward 4Chan refugees, they should still have to adhere to the rules of common sense.

    • Natanael
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Jill Stein was a spoiler candidate to help Trump

      • Unruffled [they/them]M
        link
        fedilink
        03 months ago

        There can be only two candidates to choose from, and both will be genocide supporters, and you will be happy you have a vote.

        • Natanael
          link
          fedilink
          9
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-says-jill-stein-favorite-politicians-1980202

          https://fairvote.org/jill-stein-and-spoiler-season/

          Despite this poll, the conventional wisdom remains (and most polling suggests) that Green candidates hurt Democrats more than Republicans. The parties seem to be approaching Stein’s campaign accordingly.

          In addition to the ad, Democrats have hammered Stein’s candidacy in recent weeks. Conservative operatives tried to help Stein qualify for the ballot in key states to hurt Vice President Harris (just as Democrats tried to help a Constitution Party candidate to hurt former President Trump).

          One thing is clear: fear and weaponization of minor-party “spoilers” is alive and well in the last days of the 2024 presidential election – except in Maine and Alaska, which use ranked choice voting to vote for president.

          With ranked choice voting, neither side would have to worry about the election being “spoiled,” and voters could confidently cast their ballots for their favorite candidate instead of feeling pressured to pick the lesser of two evils.

              • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost
                link
                fedilink
                English
                33 months ago

                Usually people making claims need citations. Republicans don’t give citations to their claims. Maybe we can be better than them?

                • @barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  43 months ago

                  Its a common tactic by the MAGA Nazis to make their opposition endlessly chase their tails proving what is already thoroughly established. NO matter how much proof is offered, they will completely deny it with propaganda and bullshit, and demand more proof. I won’t play their game. They are blissful in their ignorance, and I stopped caring about educating them long ago.

              • NSRXN
                link
                fedilink
                -13 months ago

                You’re the one that made the claim. if you can’t support it I have every reason to doubt it.

                • @barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  53 months ago

                  Third party candidates are always spoilers, Ralph Nader and Ross Perot being major ones.

                  Stein is such a good spoiler, that Republicans worked to get her on ballots, knowing she’d draw off more Dems than Reps.

                  This is basic political knowledge, and you arguing against it marks you as a troll or an idiot. Which are you?

                  • Unruffled [they/them]M
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -1
                    edit-2
                    3 months ago

                    Oh yes, I forgot democracies can only have two candidates to choose from, both with the same foreign policy towards Israel. Do you want a democracy or not? If so, there’s got to be room for more parties and candidates.

                  • NSRXN
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -43 months ago

                    according to the post-election analysis, ross perot decreased the margin of victory for clinton, and nader never spoiled any elections.

                  • NSRXN
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -53 months ago

                    you arguing against it marks you as a troll or an idiot.

                    i don’t tolerate abuse. i’ll accept your apology any time.

                  • NSRXN
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -63 months ago

                    Republicans worked to get her on ballots,

                    this does not mean that her goal was to spoil the election. her goal was to win as many votes as she could.

        • SatansMaggotyCumFart
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          There was a reason she didn’t run in 2020 and that’s because her interference wasn’t needed that year.

          • NSRXN
            link
            fedilink
            -73 months ago

            that’s the year I voted for Howie Hawkins. you’re just spreading a baseless conspiracy theory

              • NSRXN
                link
                fedilink
                -53 months ago

                your claim about why she wasn’t the candidate is baseless

                  • NSRXN
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -43 months ago

                    you made up a conspiracy theory to explain it,instead of finding literally any research

    • @Rhoeri@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43 months ago

      And if significantly less than that 38% had voted for Harris when Trump told them he would destroy America, they could have beaten Trump.

      • Unruffled [they/them]M
        link
        fedilink
        03 months ago

        Maybe folks don’t want to vote for their own oppressors, whether the oppressor in chief is Trump or Harris? But Harris would have been less oppressive you say? Tell that to the working poor who have ballooned in numbers under both Democrats and Republicans. And tell it to the Palestinians, most of whom were killed with Biden’s bombs.

        • @Rhoeri@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          43 months ago

          Riiiight. Yeah. Let’s all take a look around and see how we are SO much better off as a result of your inaction.

          • Unruffled [they/them]M
            link
            fedilink
            33 months ago

            My inaction? I’m not American. And neither do I accept the pitiful attempt of Democrats to deflect blame onto everyone but themselves for their embarrassing loss to a literal moron. You lot fucked around with plutocracy and reached the endgame early. Sucks to be you I guess.

            • @Rhoeri@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              23 months ago

              As I’ve said before, I have had comments removed from here for bringing up something unrelated to the PTB. Even though it was related as it involved the same mod, it was removed anyway.

              Now you’re here to debate a topic unrelated to the mod or the topic, even after I’ve said that I won’t discuss it with you here because I’m following the rules that were cited as reason for the removal of my comments in another post.

                • @Rhoeri@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  23 months ago

                  Yeah, well… those I responded to didn’t remove my comments. You did. So, in this case, it just took one.

                  But yea, it’s best to leave it here.

        • @doingthestuff@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -43 months ago

          Probably because there were only a few guns found, and he sent mixed messages including telling people to be peaceful and later to go home. I’ve even seen threads here where people admit it wasn’t a real insurrection. It was less violent than things that have happened in places like Seattle - and I get that different rules apply at the Capitol - but bottom line it wasn’t a slam dunk as disqualifying him in the public’s opinion.

          • Natanael
            link
            fedilink
            83 months ago

            Revisionism

            Ask for the guards’ takes on what happened instead

            • @doingthestuff@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -43 months ago

              I have heard the guards takes and I think I have a grasp on the nature of the event. I’ve also watched tons of videos including unprompted violence and also the guards letting people in, giving no resistance at all. It was a fucked up day, but was anything I said untrue?

              • Natanael
                link
                fedilink
                73 months ago

                Because they were outnumbered, they had to distract the crowd to not let them reach the politicians. There were a goddamn guillotine outside, and several participants are guilty of violent crimes and had weapons stashed in vehicles nearby.