• @catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    It’s because it’s not quite true. Reproductive rates are inversely correlated with wealth and education. If you’re poor, you need more kids to help the family (and, morbidly, even more kids in case some die due to lack of healthcare), especially once you yourself become elderly. When you’re secure, you end up not doing that.

    But if you’re secure, but the world sucks, you say “why would I want to bring a child into this?”

    If you want to maintain a population, you need to create the conditions for people to want to have kids, and give them the opportunity. Separately, you should also want to give your citizens a high standard of living.

    • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 month ago

      But if you’re secure, but the world sucks, you say “why would I want to bring a child into this?”

      Then the people around me must be oblivious af cause they’re pretty secure, lifestyle wise. I’m not talking about farmers or daily wage workers. The people I’m referring to have stable jobs and monthly income.

    • Maeve
      link
      fedilink
      -21 month ago

      That’s not really true anymore, but poorly aware people cling to outdated ideas