• @disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    575 days ago

    Legitimate question here. What’s stopping researchers from creating their own federated publishing system for academic journals?

      • adr1an
        link
        fedilink
        English
        135 days ago

        Not peer reviewed though. Those are called preprints and not papers. Both would be research articles but the difference matters (to scientists at least).

        There’s JOSS which is reviewed. I love it!

    • @mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      48
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Big grants and research money connections are typically only accessible because your paper got published in a “reputable” journal, which of course you only have a chance of getting if you publish with a “reputable” system.

      spoiler

      Reputable my ass

    • HexesofVexes
      link
      fedilink
      English
      425 days ago

      Short Answer - Universities

      Long Answer:

      To get and hold a job as an academic, you must continually produce “high quality research”. To get the job, in the first place, you must also be seen to do this.

      “High quality” is often metriced by universities to mean “published in high impact journals” and “well cited”. This metric is known to be faulty, but universities really dislike change.

      So, to get a job, you have to give up your rights to your research, and to keep your job, you have to do likewise.

      Worse, in the current financial climate, academia is seeing unprecedented cuts, which further entrenches this issue.