• @Rusty@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    332 months ago

    I would rather buy a game on steam, or better yet on gog, than giving my money to a company that is trying to make store exclusive games a thing.

    • @gl38@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 months ago

      Wait, I’m confused. The article is about how Epic won’t take a cut to a point. Surely, you’re not giving money to Epic if you buy the game on EGS?

      • @CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 months ago

        If my purchase on Epic helps the game reach $1 million in revenue then I am giving money to Epic.

      • @howrar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        132 months ago

        Yes, because they still allow you to spend your money elsewhere if a new storefront appears on the market. Epic is actively preventing that.

          • @stephen01king@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 months ago

            Yes, that’s what exclusive access to games mean. You can’t buy them from other stores because Epic is actively preventing the developers from doing so.

              • @stephen01king@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 months ago

                So we can’t complain about Valve’s 30% cut, then? Because its a legal agreement that game companies willingly enter into, is it not? What about game companies overworking their developers? It’s all dandy because the devs willingly agreed when they enter into the employment?

                You’re also forgetting about games that Epic pulled from other stores after buying the company making them. That’s even shittier than releasing games exclusively on Epic.

      • @Rusty@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 months ago

        I mentioned two stores in my comment, what exclusive access to money are you talking about?