Lady Butterfly to Memes@sopuli.xyzEnglish • 5 days agoImpossiblesopuli.xyzimagemessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1433arrow-down114
arrow-up1419arrow-down1imageImpossiblesopuli.xyzLady Butterfly to Memes@sopuli.xyzEnglish • 5 days agomessage-square37fedilink
minus-square@corsicanguppy@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglish3•5 days ago there was no year 0 Just because no one said it was there, doesn’t mean it wasn’t. It’s like vaccines and autism and other things RFK doesnt believe in. They still exist!
minus-square@blitzen@lemmy.calinkfedilink1•5 days ago Dionysius did not use a year zero; the year preceding AD 1 was 1 BC. “The Oxford Companion to the Year” by Blackburn & Holford-Strevens There was not a year zero. This isn’t a conspiracy theory.
minus-square@Malfeasant@lemm.eelinkfedilink1•4 days agoBC and AD are separate numbering schemes- so just because there is no year 0 defined doesn’t mean you can’t extrapolate - 0 AD is the same as 1 BC, and you’ll have -1 AD which is equivalent to 2 BC and so forth…
Just because no one said it was there, doesn’t mean it wasn’t.
It’s like vaccines and autism and other things RFK doesnt believe in. They still exist!
There was not a year zero. This isn’t a conspiracy theory.
BC and AD are separate numbering schemes- so just because there is no year 0 defined doesn’t mean you can’t extrapolate - 0 AD is the same as 1 BC, and you’ll have -1 AD which is equivalent to 2 BC and so forth…