• @Uncle_Bagel@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1221 year ago

    Multiple doctors came forward to say that their concerns were ahot down by hospital administrators. They cared more about a bad mark on their record than a someone harming newborns under their watch.

    • GladiusB
      link
      fedilink
      181 year ago

      She worked in neo natal. That is already “at risk” births. Premature. Addicts. All sorts of things that are risky to begin with. I’m not justifying anything she or the administration did. However it is to be expected at times in those units. Sounds heartless but my family was in those departments for many years.

      • Alien Nathan Edward
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        Okay but the mortality numbers for her unit pretty clearly and obviously pointed to the fact that something was happening here other than the natural deaths one would expect in a NICU

        • GladiusB
          link
          fedilink
          -21 year ago

          Absolutely. However it took more time because it’s an inherent risk for the unit.

      • @ciaocibai@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        They said other than when she was working, and before and after she left the number was around or close to 0-2 per year, so pretty obviously an anomaly and certainly worthy of an investigation. The doctors that reported her were punished by the administrators and actually forced to apologise to her so I think they are pretty guilty in the circumstances.

    • @PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      Kill a bunch of babies? Jail forever.

      Ignore someone killing babies to keep your £250,000 a year job safe? That’s just good neoliberaling.