• How? WSL is absolutely awful for adoption. Theres no GUI, it bearly runs GUI apps, and you have to manually configure it. If my first experience with Linux was WSL I would never touch Linux again.

    • @Quatlicopatlix@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      317 days ago

      And i always thought Real™️ linux users dont need a desktop manager? No wait they need arch with a tiled window manager because it looks cool but actually dont do annything besides configure their install.

      • @Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        117 days ago

        If you actually do work, getting used to a tiling WM is like a drug. I can’t live without it now.

        (that’s a lie, I do at work cus I’m forced to use Windows, so WSL with tmux is an acceptable alternative)

        • @Quatlicopatlix@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          117 days ago

          Ok but what is your job then? I do software development and in no way would it make my work faster if i can type 2 more words a minute because i dont type that much. Most time is used to read sourcecode, chassing references through the codebase and reading api references in the browser. If i have to do more hardware related stuff i would never want to use a keyboard to scroll through datasheets.

    • @Gladaed@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      217 days ago

      When working with Linux I want a CLI and GUI for some applications. No need. To be fair, I primarily use windows because VS22 with resharpen is pretty nice (with graphical debugging).

      • Yes but thats sorta the point, WSL users like you are Windows users. Not really Linux users, you run a glorified VM. It makes perfect sense for devs to get annoyed when WSL users complain about WSL bugs to package or distro maintainers. Theres nothing wrong with that obviously but its still misleading whenever a WSL user calls themselves a Linux user (not to say that applies to you)