@dwazou@lemm.ee to science@lemmy.worldEnglish • edit-21 month agoIs red meat bad for health? Meta-study of 44 studies finds results depend on the sponsor. If the sponsor is impartial, studies find it's bad. Studies sponsored by the meat industry find the oppositepubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govexternal-linkmessage-square77fedilinkarrow-up1509arrow-down111cross-posted to: vegan@lemmy.world
arrow-up1498arrow-down1external-linkIs red meat bad for health? Meta-study of 44 studies finds results depend on the sponsor. If the sponsor is impartial, studies find it's bad. Studies sponsored by the meat industry find the oppositepubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov@dwazou@lemm.ee to science@lemmy.worldEnglish • edit-21 month agomessage-square77fedilinkcross-posted to: vegan@lemmy.world
minus-square@witty_username@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglish99•1 month agoAnd this is yet another reason why we need independent science funding, kids
minus-square@Scolding7300@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish23•1 month agoScience has been canceled until 2028
minus-squareM137linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 month agoSeriously? Independent from anything and anyone that has an interest in the results going any specific way. How is that not obvious?
And this is yet another reason why we need independent science funding, kids
Science has been canceled until 2028
Found the American.
Independent of whom/what?
Seriously? Independent from anything and anyone that has an interest in the results going any specific way. How is that not obvious?