• @sugarfoot00@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    37 days ago

    Privatization of liquor in Alberta has worked out amazingly well. Booze is cheaper and there’s a liquor store every 100 meters, some open well past midnight. It’s an alcoholic’s dream.

    • Krudler
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I mean to an alcoholic in the small scale it sounds like it’s working out great.

      But Canada’s recently done a study that shows the taxation gained from alcohol consumption is far less than the deleterious societal costs.

      Effectively the government loses money on every bottle it taxes.

      edit: This is known as Canada’s alcohol deficit. It was first studied in 2014 which showed a taxation intake of ~11 Billion while the social costs were estimated to be ~15B resulting in a deficit of about ~4B. believe the 2020 study showed the alcohol deficit is up to ~6B a year now. I’m lazy, but here’s one link for those who’d like to know more:

      https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/reports-publications/health-promotion-chronic-disease-prevention-canada-research-policy-practice/vol-40-no-5-6-2020/alcohol-deficit-canadian-government-revenue-societal-costs.html

    • @Alaik@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      57 days ago

      TIL Alberta had state run liquor stores. I’ll have to read about those when I get home.

    • @Jamablaya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      27 days ago

      Same with auto insurance, if you’re a responsible driver. I’ve lived in BC, Alberta and Saskatchewan among other places the last 25 years, and Alberta is consistently far cheaper for auto insurance, if you shop around. A lot of people close to the AB border on the sask side do a little light fraud and pretend to live at their brothers house in alberta

      • Krudler
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16 days ago

        I think Quebec has (or at one time had?) the lowest because you’re not required to have collision insurance. You can have just liability, but if your car is a piece of shit you’re not required to insure it for repair should an accident occur. I could be wrong, and I’d love to know if I am.

        • @Revan343@lemmy.ca
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          06 days ago

          you’re not required to have collision insurance. You can have just liability, but if your car is a piece of shit you’re not required to insure it for repair should an accident occur

          Are there places where this isn’t the case?

          • Krudler
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            In my city you are required to have both liability and collision even if the car is worth a dollar. That is true across all of Canada to my knowledge, with the exception of Quebec.

            • @Jamablaya@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              Absolutely false. You’re not required to have collision on your own vehicle anywhere as far as I know. Collision on the other vehicle falls under liability, unless of course you haven’t paid your vehicle off yet, but even then, that’s a requirement of the bank, not the insurer. I don’t know every provinces laws perfectly, but I do know cities don’t determine insurance law.

            • @Revan343@lemmy.ca
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              16 days ago

              In my city you are required to have both liability and collision even if the car is worth a dollar.

              I’d be curious what city, but obviously you don’t have to answer that.

              That is true across all of Canada to my knowledge, with the exception of Quebec.

              Then you would be misinformed, because collision coverage is certainly not mandatory in Alberta, and I doubt it’s mandatory anywhere