• @conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    2812 days ago

    They’re pretty okay for shallow understanding on a subject, but Wendover (not on the list), Economics Explained (not on the list), and CGP gray all get stuff pretty wrong once you get past shallow depth. I know because I’m a huge transit/urbanism nerd. If these channels haven’t wronged you in some minor way, they just haven’t talked about something you’re a subject matter expert in yet. The point here isn’t that they’re bad, just understand that these are shallow explainers, the next step in from like a news article, Wikipedia, or a blog, and take them with a grain of salt.

    My personal list is Kurzgesagt, XKCD explained, and The Action Lab.

    • @Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      1512 days ago

      Wendover is pretty bad and finding out they take essentially bribes in the form of free stays and travel from an amusement park to say only nice things a little them after the park had an accident that killed a kid makes it so it’s pretty obvious it’s not about being good content for us but for the people making it. Likely tax write-offs and funny accounting all over their channels.
      They state that they aren’t for education but entertainment and thus don’t have a to cite sources either.
      Yeah they aren’t a trustworthy source is my point.

    • N-E-N
      link
      fedilink
      612 days ago

      Do you have examples of CGP Grey getting things pretty wrong aside from his Solution to Traffic video which I indeed think holds up poorly.