• Lka1988
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    The announcement also marks a change in how Apple signifies its major updates to iOS. Under the previous marketing scheme, this year’s major release would have been iOS 19 — the direct follow-up to iOS 18. But now, Apple’s big iOS updates will be numbered based on the year following their introduction

    Well that’s interesting. I was certain The Verge was trying to be funny. But this tracks, now Apple has Biggest Number™.

    Edit: This has to be a joke. Who the fuck thought this up? I can’t take this seriously…

    • @MimicJar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      It’s not a matter of biggest number, it’s a matter of consistency.

      They have five operating systems, macOS, iOS, iPadOS, watchOS, visionOS.

      So currently we have macOS 15, iOS 18, iPadOS 18, watchOS 11 & visionOS 2. That’s absolute confusion. Do I have the latest version? Dropping support for an older version, how many years ago was that?

      A version number should convey useful information, and the year it was released is useful information. Especially when major updates come every year.

      Edit: I forgot tvOS, also version 18. So six operating systems.

      • @ilega_dh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        012 days ago

        I was just discussing this with a friend, I have no clue these days what iOS or macOS version is the latest. I guess this does help but it feels like a Windows 8 to 10 jump in steroids

      • Lka1988
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -1
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        It’s not a matter of biggest number, it’s a matter of consistency.

        They have five operating systems, macOS, iOS, iPadOS, watchOS, visionOS.

        So currently we have macOS 15, iOS 18, iPadOS 18, watchOS 11 & visionOS 2. That’s absolute confusion. Do I have the latest version? Dropping support for an older version, how many years ago was that?

        I don’t disagree with you on principle, but I still think the implementation is fucking bonkers.

        A version number should convey useful information, and the year it was released is useful information. Especially when major updates come every year.

        Major updates should come when they’re needed, not on a set schedule. CVEs don’t wait. Yes, I know patches and security updates are a thing. I still think it’s ridiculous. And I absolutely blame Apple for setting the “new thing every year” trend in motion.

      • Lka1988
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -1
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        Yes, but Samsung went from S10 to S20 -> 21 -> 22, etc. That move made sense. And even skipping the Note 6 for the (ill-fated) Note 7 made sense as that was just a single number skipped.

        iOS 18 -> iOS 26 makes absolutely no sense. Maybe wait until iOS 20, then release iOS 30? IDK, but this is Apple we’re talking about. Sense was never in the cards.