Tehran “is the principal source of regional instability and terror,” declare G7 leaders in a joint statement.

The leaders of the G7 countries on Monday issued a joint statement saying Iran should not have nuclear weapons and affirming Israel’s right to defend itself.

“Iran is the principal source of regional instability and terror. We have been consistently clear that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon,” declared the statement, issued by the leaders of the U.S., U.K., France, Germany, Italy, Canada and Japan, along with the EU.

They pledged to “remain vigilant to the implications for international energy markets and stand ready to coordinate, including with like-minded partners, to safeguard market stability.”

    • @tankplanker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      721 days ago

      Germany was miles off, they lost the war before the first bomb was dropped, 7th May vs. 6th August. Its impossible for them to be both behind the Allied effort to make a nuclear bomb (so would have not been read to drop one until after 6th August) and still make one after they surrendered.

      The Allies very much lied to the scientists about how far along the Germans were to guilt them into making one against objections raised at the time.

      Now if those defecting Nazis who joined NASA and the like post war would have instead been used to replace objecting Allied scientists in the nuclear program, thats a real possibility.

      • @foggenbooty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        121 days ago

        There’s no real way of knowing what would have happened, but knowledge is eventually gained. Somebody would have developed nukes even if it tool a lot longer and we’d end up being in a similar situation eventually.

        • @turmacar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          21 days ago

          Knowledge is eventually gained, someone would have built practical devices relating to nuclear fission, whether that was a bomb or a reactor.

          Nazi Germany would not have done that in any time frame relevant to WWII. They specifically rejected aspects of atomic/quantum theory because they were tainted by “jewish science” which unknowingly set them back decades and sent them in the wrong direction. As much as they were obsessed with super weapons, they were very unscientific in their R&D.

          • @prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            121 days ago

            They specifically rejected aspects of atomic/quantum theory because they were tainted by “jewish science” which unknowingly set them back decades and sent them in the wrong direction.

            This shit sounds so familiar…

    • @BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      421 days ago

      The Germans were literally defeated before the bomb was finished! Jesus Christ, how bad is education these days.

    • @EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 days ago

      This illustrates exactly why we, as a species, are fucking doomed. If some on can do something that gives them a competitive edge, then someone will do it. Those who opt out are left behind.

      It’s why we can’t stop fossil fuels. Whoever stops using them will be at a competitive disadvantage. It’s why we can’t just leave AI on the shelf.

    • @fullsquare@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 days ago

      either that, or nukes would be used first in korean war instead. imo it’s a good thing that nukes were first used against the most cartoonishly evil fascist state imaginable at that point