• Ulrich
    link
    fedilink
    English
    020 days ago

    Then you’re also a terrorist if you use The Guardian 🤷‍♂️

    • @Diurnambule@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      I dont’ know, do you have sources about this ? Or are you imagining thing and deciding it is true ?

      • Ulrich
        link
        fedilink
        English
        020 days ago

        Sources for what, exactly? What is “fantasming”? The title of the article you posted is “Criminalization of encryption”. The Guardian is using encryption to send messages, so why would they be exempt? In fact, why would any internet use at all not be criminalized? It’s all encrypted.

        • @Diurnambule@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          20 days ago

          So you read the title and you know everything. There is a liste of what they are accusing and their is no mention of internet

          The elements of the investigation that have been communicated to us are staggering. Here are just some of the practices that are being misused as evidence of terrorist behavior6:

          – the use of applications such as Signal, WhatsApp, Wire, Silence or ProtonMail to encrypt communications ;

          – using Internet privacy tools such as VPN, Tor or Tails7 ;

          – protecting ourselves against the exploitation of our personal data by GAFAM via services such as /e/OS, LineageOS, F-Droid ;

          – encrypting digital media;

          – organizing and participating in digital hygiene training sessions;

          – simple possession of technical documentation.

          But continue to invent reality. What are fact if not debatable point of view ? That the end for me. Have a great day.