• @AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        1310 days ago

        Using something like PeerTube is potentially even worse because let’s say you unknowingly open a video where someone in it looks of age but technically isn’t. You as a user help propagate that content while you have it open. You’re not just downloading illegal content at that point. You’re actively sharing it to new people.

        • Ulrich
          link
          fedilink
          English
          110 days ago

          You as a user help propagate that content while you have it open.

          I’m sure that’s a legal grey area that hasn’t been explored largely but I would think you would have to actually host the content or have it on your device locally.

          • @AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            19 days ago

            In a sense, you are hosting the content. You’re retaining a copy (so long as the window is open) and constantly attempting to spread it. It’s literally built on bittorrent protocols if I remember correctly, and it’s already very well established that you can be held responsible for seeding copyright infringing material, so I see no reason at all they’d give you a pass for CP instead. You may not intend to, but remember, my example was someone who looks of age but is not.

            • Ulrich
              link
              fedilink
              English
              19 days ago

              It’s literally built on bittorrent protocols

              literally webtorrents*

              it’s already very well established that you can be held responsible for seeding copyright infringing material

              Right, because you’re hosting it and distributing it. PeerTube is just like a window to non-local content (except for the local content, obvi).

      • @x00z@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        310 days ago

        A single instance is not federated by itself. It requires multiple instances to be considered a federation.

        Just a little nitpick.

          • @x00z@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            17 days ago

            Yes but the question was for a federated alternative. lemmynsfw is not a federation by itself. It’s only a part of a larger federation.

            You would need multiple nsfw lemmy instances which can then become their own federation. Or a separate federation software on top of ActivityPub.

    • @huppakee@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      710 days ago

      A Foss and federated alternative to onlyfans is more achievable I guess, because pornhub nowadays has to verify the owner of the content.

      • @rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        310 days ago

        Legal yeah, but it doesn’t stop … thousands? tens of thousands? of random porn sites. There’s no shortage of community driven porn at the moment. Federated solutions only seem to pop up when there’s sufficient non-legal censorship of community-driven content.