@PugJesus@lemmy.worldM to NonCredibleDefense@lemmy.worldEnglish • 13 days agoWhy haven't national militaries tried this yet? Are they stupid?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down11
arrow-up16arrow-down1imageWhy haven't national militaries tried this yet? Are they stupid?lemmy.world@PugJesus@lemmy.worldM to NonCredibleDefense@lemmy.worldEnglish • 13 days agomessage-square8fedilink
minus-square@Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish0•13 days agoThe only flaw with this plan is, if you piss someone off badly enough, there is no bunker that will withstand a direct hit from a nuke.
minus-square@Gladaed@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglish0•13 days agoThat’s wrong. You can’t get a direct hit on a bunker with a nuke. Also nukes don’t hit anything. They burst in the air to prevent all energy from going up.
minus-square@Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish0•13 days agoWhen you’re dealing with megatons of yield, directly above the bunker is a direct hit.
minus-square@Gladaed@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglish1•12 days agoPath of least resistance + air pressure due to there being no where to go resists the explosion.
minus-square@Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish1•12 days agoResists, sure. Ain’t nothing stopping that.
The only flaw with this plan is, if you piss someone off badly enough, there is no bunker that will withstand a direct hit from a nuke.
That’s wrong. You can’t get a direct hit on a bunker with a nuke. Also nukes don’t hit anything. They burst in the air to prevent all energy from going up.
When you’re dealing with megatons of yield, directly above the bunker is a direct hit.
Path of least resistance + air pressure due to there being no where to go resists the explosion.
Resists, sure. Ain’t nothing stopping that.