Was recently banned from a whole bunch of DB0 communities for, as best as I can gather, downvoting once when I viewed by All (potentially accidentally while scrolling).

Important notes:

  1. I don’t use scripts.
  2. I don’t mass-downvote Communities. If I see a post I generally don’t like when browsing All, I may downvote one post, block the Community and move on.
  3. Some of the communities I was banned from don’t have any posts in them so I wouldn’t have been able to downvote anything.
  4. Of all of these Communities, in my history I downvoted one post in one of them. Voting in this manner is not vote manipulation. It’s quite literally a feature of the platform and as a mod of another Community, I would consider it pretty good etiquette.
  5. One of my bans reads “Appeal Granted, not a brigading member” but I’m still banned.
  6. I don’t troll.

WTF is going on here?

EDIT - Updated Info from the conversation below: In the initial image, you can see two “ban waves.”

The 10 bans three months ago stem from a single downvote in one Community. It was @Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com See here: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/34853477

I was called out by name for a single downvote and culled from a score of Communities I did not participate in by them.

The other bans from two months ago are from four total downvotes over a 10-month timeframe in one Community.

I have also stated in this thread that I don’t have issues with AI-gen images, but there are shoddy ones and well-done ones.

EDIT 2: Now unbanned from the ten Communities listed as “3 months ago” in my initial image, but have been banned from three more because of this thread with the reason given being “self-proclaimed anti-AI brigader” which are two things I didn’t claim to be. God dammit Lemmy…

    • Deceptichum
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -819 days ago

      Those same people probably find intellectual property moral, so immoral people themselves.

        • @curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          1019 days ago

          Thats a capitalism problem, not an AI problem. AI is just the most recent example.

          They shouldn’t have to rely on maybe getting paid so they can have food, shelter, and other basic things for living.

          • @AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            -319 days ago

            Right… but they do… so…

            Irrelevant until we fix that problem. And guess what? Advocating for AI in the meantime is only going to give more power to corporations :) so great job, bud!

            • @curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              5
              edit-2
              19 days ago

              I dont advocate for corporate AI.

              I’d also mention most users on db0 are far more likely to be using fully open models and models they’ve trained themselves (which is what I do, mostly log/error eval stuff).

              That said, “fixing” AI will solve nothing, because capitalism is going to find yet another way to screw them over. Banning AI tomorrow isn’t going to provide job security or a stable income, it wasn’t before and it isn’t now.

              I work with a lot of creatives, and so many are contract based and struggle between them. Several of them have been finding work cleaning up (as in, creating new) materials that were AI generated and look terrible.

              So again, the issue is capitalism, and AI is just the most recent conversation piece. AI isn’t the root of the problem, nor is the problem “solved” without it.

                • “Fixing capitalism” is just ending capitalism, the problems are inherent in its design.

                  In any case, you seem to be under the impression that all AI is just chatgpt, copilot, Gemini, grok, meta, etc. This is not the case. There are models trained entirely on peoples own work/material, models trained only on public domain materials, etc. Its just software and data, and the issue you are taking is - from your example - a capitalism problem, and has nothing to do with the software.

                  So what you’re saying now reads no differently than “We have to fix capitalism before we can advocate for Linux!”

                  Would that make sense as a statement to you?

                  • @AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -118 days ago

                    That’s a fair statement, but I think it’s a more fair statement to say almost anyone hating on AI is usually referring to corporate AI in the first place. Also, the person whose behalf you’re defending AI clearly thinks that the AIs being trained on other peoples’ work is completely fine. So I think you jumped in on the wrong side tbh

        • Deceptichum
          link
          fedilink
          English
          8
          edit-2
          19 days ago

          Congratulations you’ve discovered capitalism is the enemy.

          No reasonable leftist will ever take you seriously if you want to fight for the status quo.

          So go fuck yourself :)

          • @AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            -319 days ago

            Right, did you miss the part where the AIs are usually trained using stolen data and also consume huge amounts of energy? Why are you defending AI rn? 🥱

            • @null@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              19 days ago

              Did I miss the part where you made a terrible argument and are now pivoting to something else?

              Nope sure didn’t.