Track_Shovel to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish • 22 days agoPerspectiveslrpnk.netimagemessage-square99fedilinkarrow-up1119arrow-down18
arrow-up1111arrow-down1imagePerspectiveslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish • 22 days agomessage-square99fedilink
minus-squareNielsBohronlinkfedilinkEnglish7•edit-221 days agoAnd you can see the wear on the treads. plus the handrail mount in the top left would be at a very inconvenient height if we were looking from the bottom up
minus-square@NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilink8•21 days agoThe handrail argument doesn’t make any sense. It would be at the same height regardless of direction.
minus-square@eatCasserole@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink8•21 days agoAlso, the handrail mount is sideways if we’re looking down; if we’re looking up, it makes sense.
minus-squareObinicelinkfedilink5•21 days agoIt’s at the top, I have that same bannister mount, it points upwards to the banister. The mattress is wedged at the top of the stairs thanks to its extreme springiness.
And you can see the wear on the treads. plus the handrail mount in the top left would be at a very inconvenient height if we were looking from the bottom up
The handrail argument doesn’t make any sense. It would be at the same height regardless of direction.
Also, the handrail mount is sideways if we’re looking down; if we’re looking up, it makes sense.
Maybe it is a light fixture.
It’s at the top, I have that same bannister mount, it points upwards to the banister.
The mattress is wedged at the top of the stairs thanks to its extreme springiness.