• @runiq@feddit.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    2918 days ago

    “[Trump] said, and I agree, there are a lot of names associated with Epstein that had nothing to do with Epstein’s conduct. They maybe had lunch with him or maybe had some correspondence for one thing or another,” O’Reilly began. “If that name gets out, those people are destroyed — because there’s not going to be any context. The media doesn’t care about context — so you can’t do that. You can’t destroy human beings by putting out the files, whatever they may be.”

    Oh, yeah, Bill, you’re totally right. Lemme just put pown this pitchfork and torch and go right along with NAW I’M JUST KIDDIN EAT THE RICH

    • @fartographer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      818 days ago

      You can’t destroy human beings by putting out the files, whatever they may be.

      - Donald “Russia, if you’re listening” fucking Trump

    • Nightwatch Admin
      link
      fedilink
      718 days ago

      Technically, that’s true. A fair bit of investigation would help, but friend Patel isn’t in much of a hurry, now is he? And this was never an issue before either, when it was - say - the Clintons’ heads that were gonna roll, why is that then?

    • notsure
      link
      fedilink
      218 days ago

      …the fact that ASSOCIATION with the name Jeffery Epstein could be tainted is enough, at least for the court of public opinion…