nevermind that these are the same people who want to rigidly define women by their gametes, chromosomes, or other biological characteristics (not how buff they are, or how masculine they present)
or that these are the same people who came up with the idea that everyone is straight to begin with (“gay” being a sinful behavior, nobody being born gay)
According to xitter, if the woman is very muscular, then yes.
I don’t quite understand why though.
right wing politics promotes rigid gender norms
including that only men should be muscular
so muscular women are masculine
and men attracted to a masculine person are gay
nevermind that these are the same people who want to rigidly define women by their gametes, chromosomes, or other biological characteristics (not how buff they are, or how masculine they present)
or that these are the same people who came up with the idea that everyone is straight to begin with (“gay” being a sinful behavior, nobody being born gay)
Xitter told me dating someone with XXY chomosomes is 50% gay and just one X chomosome would be Schrodinger’s gay
(/s for the tone deaf)
’nuff said