• Maple Engineer
    link
    fedilink
    93 days ago

    90 year olds aren’t going to vote for education, childcare, etc. They have a few years left to live. 16 year old have their entire lives to live. Look at what happened in Britain. Old people voted to withdraw from the EU which disproportionately harmed young, mobile professionals.

    • @floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      This idea that old people care only about themselves is wrong, and very much a young person’s view. As you get older it’s not uncommon to care less about getting things for yourself (what are you going to do with it?) and more about the people and world you’re going to leave behind. An old person who appreciates the value of education or healthcare doesn’t stop wanting that for the country just because they’re soon going to be gone.

    • @panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      13 days ago

      A lot of 80/90 year olds have family they love.

      I get what you’re saying, but I don’t think letting 16 year olds vote is the right move.

      • Maple Engineer
        link
        fedilink
        43 days ago

        All 16 year olds pay into the programs that support the few 90 year olds. They’re a pyramid scheme that takes from the young and gives to the old. 16 year olds are old enough to pay taxes and they are old enough to vote.

        No vote, no taxes.

        • @panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          53 days ago

          Canada’s OAS and CPP are not a pyramid scheme, they’re based on what you actually put in and guaranteed.

          They don’t have the solvency issues that US Social Security has.

            • @panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              12 days ago

              I would be fine with not charging workers under 18 tax.

              When I was that age saving for university wasn’t easy and staying life off with a bunch of debt and no guaranteed job isn’t fun.

    • @FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      02 days ago

      I could defintely see 16 year olds voting against their best interests, such as lower drinking ages, less school years, easier school circulums. Ending school at grade 10 might sound like a great idea to a 16 year old and the mp pitching it could convince older canadians it would save a lot of taxes as well, all well significantly impacting that new generations education potential.

      • Maple Engineer
        link
        fedilink
        32 days ago

        Is that worse than the adults in Alberta repeatedly voting in governments that allow foreign companies to take Alberta oil out of the province for fractions of a penny on the dollar while failing to put away sufficient reserve funds to clean up their messes in the province leaving those adult voters and their future children holding a many tens of billions of dollars cleanup bill?