@fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 4 days agoResourcesmander.xyzimagemessage-square233fedilinkarrow-up1863arrow-down146
arrow-up1817arrow-down1imageResourcesmander.xyz@fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 4 days agomessage-square233fedilink
minus-square@brianary@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglish1•21 hours agoIf it’s not compelling enough for you to read it to support your position, why would I read it?
minus-squareBodyBySisyphus [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish1•9 hours agoMy position was that you might actually learn something if you read the article, but I think you’ve provided sufficient evidence that I was wrong.
If it’s not compelling enough for you to read it to support your position, why would I read it?
My position was that you might actually learn something if you read the article, but I think you’ve provided sufficient evidence that I was wrong.