• @Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    As an example:

    Imagine, for the sake of argument, both white people and black people have a 50% chance of possessing weed (not that weed should even be criminalized, but you get the idea).

    Now also let’s take a group of 100 people, assuming 80 are white and 20 are black. Given the above weed possession rate, we can say there are 40 weed-carrying white people and 10 weed-carrying black people.

    Now imagine cops last year searched 20% of the total population, 90% of those searched being black and 10% being white. Thus, last year, 18 black people were searched and only 2 white people. Of these searched people, 9 black people were caught in possession of weed vs 1 white person.

    Thus, the newspapers can now publish “9 black criminals for every 1 white criminal!”, and so the police decide to continue mostly searching black people this year.

    Same underlying crime rates, but searching one demographic more skews the resulting arrest record and seemingly justifies further discriminatory enforcement.

    • snooggums
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      Don’t even need to imagine it when every study shows that is an accurate description.

      • Gumby
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Sure, but a lot of people need it very clearly spelled out for them.