• @wahming
    link
    English
    321 year ago

    For games with a shitton of content, I’m not sure it’s entirely possible. You just can’t have every single combination of stuff checked out after every change

    • iAmTheTot
      link
      fedilink
      17
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There were 1st level spells that had missing info or flat out wrong info. This is content players are immediately going to interact with.

      There’s a major NPC whose story line gets broken beyond repair in multiplayer if you don’t do things just right. This is only a few hours into the game.

      I don’t think I’m setting a very high bar here.

      • Feydaikin
        link
        fedilink
        171 year ago

        Compared to a lot of Triple-A games out there, it is polished.

        It’s a pretty big game with a lot of variations. And as i said; It just got it’s first patch and more are coming.

        It took Bethesda about 12 years before they got around to fixing the “Games for Windows Live” thing in Fallout 3. Which literally made the game unplayable. That was a problem.

        I’m sure they’ll get Wyll fixed for you, if he hasn’t already been in this patch.

        But now I’m intrigued… If you don’t think you’re setting the bar high, what games are you comparing BG3 to that were that bug free at launch?

        • iAmTheTot
          link
          fedilink
          121 year ago

          Scope is not an excuse for bugs and I’m tired of people making that argument. If they couldn’t deliver this scope as a polished game, maybe they should have reduced the scope.

          • @gk99@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            171 year ago

            Gonna be real with you, this is a terrible take. I’d much rather have games pushing boundaries at the cost of some bugs rather than a bunch of the same old regurgitated elements over and over to be safe.

            GTA3 had plenty of bugs, the Purple Nines glitch being particularly infamous. Literally nobody out there is saying “wow, I wish they’d stuck with the top-down style games instead of going 3D because this bug has seriously inconvenienced me.”

          • Feydaikin
            link
            fedilink
            15
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            We wouldn’t have any games with the stardards you’re suggesting. I think you’d be hard pressed to live up to them yourself, if I’m being honest.

            No product is without it’s faults and flaws.

            I’m sorry you happend to be one of the people that got that bug.

            If it’s as big a deal for you as it sound like, I’d recommend getting a refund. It’s as simple as that.

            • iAmTheTot
              link
              fedilink
              61 year ago

              We wouldn’t have any games with the stardards you’re suggesting.

              This is the most ridiculous and hyperbolic thing I’ve read all week.

              • Feydaikin
                link
                fedilink
                51 year ago

                All games launch with bugs. Not necessarily game-breaking bugs, but bugs nonetheless.

                There is simply no way developers can account for every tiny potential conflict in their code. So thank god for the internet and that fixing them post-launch is a concept.

                • iAmTheTot
                  link
                  fedilink
                  61 year ago

                  My guy, stop stabbing that straw man, he did nothing to you.

                  • Feydaikin
                    link
                    fedilink
                    31 year ago

                    No idea what that’s supposed to mean.

                    The simple solution for you is just not buying games at launch.