• @MigratingApe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    (What’s with the downvotes?)

    Small scale reactors that require almost no maintenance and produce enough power for a single city are the hot topic right now due to what you just mentioned. As a side product, they provide hot water for the city.

    • @givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      (What’s with the downvotes?)

      Lots of people know virtually nothing about nuclear even tho they’re avid supporters of it. So when you point out a downside, they get mad.

      As a side product, they provide hot water for the city.

      Hot water (technically superheated steam) is the main (and only immediate) product of a nuclear reactor…

      Trying to directly use secondary coolant as hot potable water just makes zero sense though. It’s waaaaay more efficient to move the electricity and then heat different water.

      I mean, you’re talking about an open loop nuclear system…

      No sane engineer would ever do that. A small primary loop leak and your dosing everyone, all to just essentially lose efficiency.

      Where did you even see that suggested?

    • @gibmiser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Imagine living in a snowy city where hot water is pumped through the sidewalks to people’s homes. No frozen pipes, no shoveling snow. No people freezing to death…

      • Dojan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        You still need to clear snow and ice. The hot water pipes are insulated to ensure that the hot water remains hot until it goes into radiators and faucets. You’d lose all that heat if you use it to heat sidewalks.

        My city does this. Hot water is pretty cheap here if you’re hooked up to the municipal network. If you have an electric water heater you’ll go bankrupt in the winter.