@sv1sjp@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agoYoung climate activist tells Greenpeace to drop ‘old-fashioned’ anti-nuclear stancewww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square1056fedilinkarrow-up12.24Karrow-down1135
arrow-up12.1Karrow-down1external-linkYoung climate activist tells Greenpeace to drop ‘old-fashioned’ anti-nuclear stancewww.theguardian.com@sv1sjp@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square1056fedilink
minus-square@sixCats@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoI think you just contradicted yourself in that same sentence
minus-squareJackbyDevlinkfedilinkEnglish0•1 year agoNo, I’m saying that saying the radiation concerns specifically of coal output isn’t a concern with regards to health.
minus-square@Womble@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoYou’re right coal deaths are just confined to mines, respiratory illnesses and excess cancers from chronic low dose exposure.
minus-squareJackbyDevlinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year ago it’s fucking awful and causes way more deaths than nuclear power plants.
minus-square@Womble@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year ago No, I’m saying that saying the radiation concerns specifically of coal output isn’t a concern with regards to health. So chronic low level exposure to radiation is fine?
minus-squareJackbyDevlinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoI’m not saying it’s fine, I’m saying it feels like an order of magnitude less of a concern compared to all of the other bad things that can happen from coal smoke.
I think you just contradicted yourself in that same sentence
No, I’m saying that saying the radiation concerns specifically of coal output isn’t a concern with regards to health.
You’re right coal deaths are just confined to mines, respiratory illnesses and excess cancers from chronic low dose exposure.
So chronic low level exposure to radiation is fine?
I’m not saying it’s fine, I’m saying it feels like an order of magnitude less of a concern compared to all of the other bad things that can happen from coal smoke.