• @gmtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    01 year ago

    but ignoring climate change is having an impact and might end our way of life as we know it before 2100.

    Yes, so we need change FAST. Not in 15 years when the nuclear plant is finally built, not in 20 years when it starts producing commercial power, not in 25 years when it finally offsets the carbon cost of the concrete to build it, not in 30 years when it breaks even on the cost and the company can think about building another, not in 35 years when it offsets the cost in money and carbon to decommission the thing in the future. Now, so we should be building windfarms, that are MASSIVELY cheaper per MW than nuclear and can be built in 6 months and have less of a carbon impact.

    Any way you run the numbers, any metric you look at wind beats nuclear.

    I used to be very very pro nuclear, then one day I tried to argue against someone and did the calculations myself.

    • @PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      There is no conceivable way that we can reach NetZero carbon-free worldwide global economy in 15 years. This isn’t a sprint, it’s a marathon. And it’s a marathon that will last hundreds and thousands of years if human technological civilization is to continue to exist.

      Therefore, it would be prudent to invest in every carbon neutral and zero carbon technology that we can right now to achieve those goals. This is not a one technology solution. It’s an all hands on deck response to the climate crisis, and we will be lucky if we achieve this by the year 2100.

      • @gmtom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        It is very much a sprint. We are hurtling towards societal collapse (currently estimated to accoure between 2040 and 2050) and already can’t stop the worst effects of climate change, all we can do is scramble to reduce the harm as much as possible, and then means acting as a fast as possible.