The homeowner who fatally shot a 20-year-old University of South Carolina student who tried to enter the wrong home on the street he lived on Saturday morning will not face charges because the incident was deemed “a justifiable homicide” under state law, Columbia police announced Wednesday.

Police said the identity of the homeowner who fired the gunshot that killed Nicholas Donofrio shortly before 2 a.m. Saturday will not be released because the police department and the Fifth Circuit Solicitor’s Office determined his actions were justified under the state’s controversial “castle doctrine” law, which holds that people can act in self-defense towards “intruders and attackers without fear of prosecution or civil action for acting in defense of themselves and others.”

  • This wasn’t a punishment or sentence.

    He was literally breaking through the door to enter the house.

    What was the home owner supposed to do? Hope he became non-violent once he got in? Challenge him to a game of chess? Declare a set of non-lethal rules and duke it out?

    The homeowner has a right to not be attacked in his own home ffs

    • @slapchop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -61 year ago

      Idk. Maybe yell, “Hey. Fuck off” and call the police? If it is a drunk person, they probably embarrassingly realize it’s the wrong house. Or if they keep trying to get in after, then shoot?

      Also the home owner wasn’t attacked. His window was.

      • You may want to read the article - they did call the police. Unfortunately it takes less time for someone to violently smash through a door than for the cops to arrive.

        Interesting that you summize that they were apparently silent as this guy smashed their door

        And, would you really play the odds that someone violently entering your house would suddenly have a moment of clarity when they entered? He was messed up enough to think shattering his own window was a viable option to get into his house.

        • Concetta
          link
          fedilink
          -31 year ago

          But they never tried yelling at him, did they? Even after he had a firearm, the article says nothing about calling out with a warning first or anything. That seems insane to me.

          • @Fosheze@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            91 year ago

            It also doesn’t say they didn’t. Are we going to just list off a bunch of things the article doesn’t say?