Striker to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world • 2 years ago2+2=4 but what if 4 didn't exist?message-square23fedilinkarrow-up113arrow-down154
arrow-up1-41arrow-down1message-square2+2=4 but what if 4 didn't exist?Striker to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world • 2 years agomessage-square23fedilink
minus-squareDem-Bo SainlinkfedilinkEnglish3•edit-22 years agobecause 4 doesn’t exist… …I suppose it could also be 10.
because 4 doesn’t exist…
…I suppose it could also be 10.
or 11 if 3 doesn’t exist either