The legal ruling against the Internet Archive has come down in favour of the rights of authors.

  • Way to sweepingly generalize something. I had to use copyright laws when I was a pro track photographer. I found out that one of the drivers owned a printing shop. He was telling people to purchase one photo from me at my price and then turning around, scanning it in, and re-printing them for the customers at a lower price. Same exact work, so you can’t argue about the quality. This fuck was also taking my images and using them in advertising which was also a copyright violation. This isn’t about who took the better picture as I was the person behind the camera. It’s about protecting work, that in my case involved time and actual sweat each and every weekend I was out in the sun. But it seems the majority of people in this thread think that he was justified in stealing MY work.

    • @KevonLooney@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      121 year ago

      Do people buy your photos decades after you take them? No?

      So reasonable copyright terms like 10 or 15 years should be totally fine with you. Unless you are just emotional about it and ranting online.

    • Glitchington
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      When working at a print shop, we checked for copyright coverage all the time, and even refused orders over it. Watermarking the corner of your images is a good start. You can also make sure your web images are low resolution to prevent reprinting. 300ppi (pixels per inch) at scale is required for printing. Though the real kicker is, YOU are responsible for protecting your copyright, and you probably should have hired a lawyer.

    • @Trail@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      I think you gotta keep it mind that, like reddit, a majority of the people here should be assumed to be teens or so.

    • @favrion@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      -21 year ago

      Hey, just here to let you know that I 100% agree with you. You’re being attacked for no reason.