The new fairphone 5 came out, it looks cool but the price is really, really high…

If it’s a phone that can really last 10 years it could be good, but is that true? Is it worth it? I could get the one with /e/os from Murena because i want a degoogled phone with a bootloader locked, but is it usable on a daily basis?

  • @jacktherippah@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 year ago

    It’s too expensive for me. Not worth it when a used Pixel is way cheaper, has way better hardware and has support for GrapheneOS.

    • @eliasp@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      It might be expensive when you compare it to the lifetime of a regular phone, but compare it to what you’d spend instead on regular phones within the potential lifetime of 7-8 years of the FP5 (minus 1-2 minor repairs).

      • Also no one is talking about that fact that it’s fair as in equitable. Like everyone who worked to make it got paid, which is not something you can say about any of the big phone makes AFAIK.

      • @EunieIsTheBus@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        -31 year ago

        This does not only depend on the hardware’s lifespan but the software itself too. If there is no longtime support the average user might be better of using a more recent phone where all apps will work and there are not that much security issues.

          • @EunieIsTheBus@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            01 year ago

            Well they can promise updates yes. But they are limited on the android version to the manufacturer of the chips. The company shift which has a similar concept as Fairphone currently suffers from that problem: they cannot upgrade their shift5me to a higher version than android 8 and a lot of apps recently dropped their support to older android versions (e.g. banking apps)

            • @eliasp@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Fairphone have been dealing with this problem of unsupported chips for quite some years now (the hardest lesson learned was probably selecting Mediatek for the FP1) and they’ve become better and better at it - up to the point, that they chose not a mobile, but an IoT SoC for the FP5 for which they got Qualcomm to commit to much longer support than ever before. I don’t see why reason, why they shouldn’t manage to stick to this commitment in this case. On top of that, they’re even working with Qualcomm to allow for replacable SoCs for future upgrades without having to replace the whole mainboard incl. storage etc.

    • @PancakeBrock@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Got me a refurb pixel 5a last year for $100. It’s been great and way better then my moto g power I had previously.

    • @settinmoon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      I second this. Got an open box pixel 6 pro this year for $400, still blows most non-flagship current year phones out of the water.

      • @jacktherippah@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Nice, I got a renewed one from Amazon this year for $330. It was as good as new, no scratches whatsoever, battery health was at 99% and still had 3 months of warranty left.