Edit: A bunch of yall don’t seem to grasp the concept of a theoretical question

  • @Candelestine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    561 year ago

    No. Slower than light travel will still enable a smaller amount of colonization of the local area. Where if we do anything that destroys the planet, that’s kinda putting all your eggs in one basket. If that goes catastrophically wrong, as things sometimes do, then everything gets fucked up.

    It’s just an unnecessary risk.